Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

The AI Advantage

69.9k members • Free

AI Accelerator

16.8k members • Free

Automation Station

3.1k members • Free

Zero To Founder by Tom Bilyeu

2.2k members • $119/m

Accelerator

9k members • Free

Selling Online / Prime Mover

35.2k members • Free

GC
Growthworks Community

24.2k members • Free

AI Automation Agency Hub

285.1k members • Free

3 contributions to The AI Advantage
Hello From Switzerland
Hey everyone — Duncan here. Based in Switzerland, keen climber, skier and dad of two. I work with teams to help them get answers faster from internal data using private AI, usually in environments where cloud tools aren’t an option. Looking forward to learning from the group and sharing practical experiences from real deployments.
0 likes • 3m
On-prem we usually run LangFlow / LangChain on top of local models, then add the pieces around it depending on needs. Typical stack for us includes a local inference layer (vLLM / Ollama), vector store (Chroma or Postgres), document ingestion, RBAC, and full logging / audit. Often integrated with Jira, Confluence, SharePoint, or internal APIs. LangFlow helps a lot for iterating and making the flows visible to non-engineers.
What Industry Are You In?
Curious to know what industry you are are in! AI is very different depending on your industry. Lets share a comment with what our industry is and what can be done in our industry with AI.
What Industry Are You In?
0 likes • 4h
Working in Private AI as a small business. In Finance, Legal, Healthcare sectors. Mostly helping teams get faster answers to make better decisions by connecting their tools to a private AI - on prem or private cloud. Really interesting work and AI deployed correctly has so many advantages. Privacy and control need careful consideration.
🧭 Why Collaboration With AI Requires Clear Human Intent
One of the most common frustrations with AI is the feeling that it does not quite understand what we want. The responses are close, but not right. Useful, but unfocused. Impressive, but misaligned. What we often label as an AI limitation is, more accurately, a signal about our own clarity. AI collaboration does not break down because the technology lacks intelligence. It breaks down because intent is missing. Without clear human intent, even the most capable systems struggle to deliver meaningful value. ------------- Context: When AI Feels Unreliable ------------- Many people approach AI by jumping straight into interaction. They open a tool, type a prompt, and wait to see what comes back. If the output misses the mark, the conclusion is often that the AI is unreliable, inconsistent, or not ready for real work. What is less often examined is the quality of the starting point. Vague goals, unspoken constraints, and half-formed questions are common. We know we want help, but we have not articulated what success actually looks like. In traditional tools, this ambiguity is sometimes tolerated. Software either works or it does not. AI behaves differently. It fills in gaps, makes assumptions, and extrapolates based on patterns. When intent is unclear, those assumptions can drift far from what we actually need. This creates a cycle of frustration. We ask loosely, receive loosely, and then blame the system for not reading our minds. The opportunity for collaboration gets lost before it really begins. ------------- Insight 1: AI Amplifies What We Bring ------------- AI does not generate value in isolation. It amplifies inputs. When we bring clarity, it amplifies clarity. When we bring confusion, it amplifies confusion. This is why two people can use the same tool and have radically different experiences. One sees insight and leverage. The other sees noise and inconsistency. The difference is rarely technical skill. It is intent. Intent acts as a filter. It tells the system what matters and what does not. Without it, AI produces breadth instead of relevance. With it, the same system can surface nuance, trade-offs, and direction.
🧭 Why Collaboration With AI Requires Clear Human Intent
2 likes • 4h
Seems like a good model to get what you'd like as a response. One practical way we’ve made this visible with teams is by testing intent, not just prompts. In tools like the Anthropic Workbench (or similar eval setups), you can run the same task across slightly different intents and models and compare outcomes side-by-side. The difference is rarely the model. It’s almost always the clarity of what “good” looks like. When you define outcome + constraints first, the variance collapses and the output becomes predictable and usable. Without that, people end up prompt-tweaking endlessly and blaming inconsistency. Treat intent as the spec, prompts as implementation details. Everything gets easier after that.
1-3 of 3
Duncan Robinson
1
1point to level up
@duncan-robinson
I help teams get faster, more reliable answers from internal data with private AI systems.

Active 2m ago
Joined Jan 17, 2026
Switzerland
Powered by