Excellent interview. Yet again, another person from Iran shows the world that the IRGC is a different group of people. The free-thinking people of Iran sound like *this*.

Who would have an interest in confusing a bunch of union workers into thinking that stopping the war now is an act of support for the communities in Iran? I don't know the answer to that question, but there must be one.

I was against the war at the time and I did some protesting, too. I wasn't foaming at the mouth "no blood for oil" but I was on that team. None the less, I did try to get the facts wherever they may lead and found many things that conflicted with my moral/ethical sensibilities. I mentioned elsewhere that President George H W Bush, in my opinion, actually put forth a good case for Desert Shield and had built a broad coalition. In hindsight so many years later, if you're going convince the public that the military should take out some bad dudes, that was comparatively well done. Desert Storm left me perplexed - why are the bad dudes still there? Why are people still arguing about what "WMD" means? What does civic responsibility demand? Fast-forward to today. The IRGC should have been gone a long time ago too, in my opinion. Bear in mind of course that my duty is civic responsibility, not military responsibility. That's for other people. Right now, those other people are doing this (screenshot) and I find myself thinking WTF? I'm thinking about what @Jeffrey Cappella posted a few days ago with the final quote from Mao, and this excerpt from "The Future of Warfare" by Bevin Alexander. https://www.bevinalexander.com/excerpts/terror-future-wars/mao-zedong-warfare-theories.htm Note: I haven't actually read this book, but I have read some of the references mentioned here and this excerpt sums it up nicely, in my opinion.

@Joseph Dabby They probably discovered tadikh a reaaaaaallly long time ago.

If you post specific coordinates and/or landmarks and generate some links I guarantee this announcement will get more traffic.