On the phone with a client yesterday who is concerned about creating the most value possible constructing their park. A couple of amenities came up and I am interested to hear if others have had experience increasing (or decreasing) their returns by having these items. Fire Suppression As it's well known, fire suppression is not always required by county fire marshal's and those building outside the city take advantage of this cost saving opportunity. But, have you encountered difficulty selling a park to another investor or institution by not having fire suppression? Structural Integrity It should be a given that a building is engineered prior to erecting, but some methods achieve "engineer's approval" but without the same tier of material usage as others. Wood framing has been discussed, and cable bracing in metal buildings is common. Has either of those methods hurt your sale to an institutional buyer in the past? For example, we were discussing portal framing vs cable bracing to achieve the same result. Cable bracing is vastly cheaper, but reduces the flexibility for changes in that bay later. Portal framing, on the other hand, is much more flexible in what can be done in the wall later because it follows the columns and rafter rather than creating a giant X in the bay. Spray foam, wood vs steel stud framing, landscaping, etc are all areas where a faster/less expensive options appears better, but could bite you later. I'm not passing a personal judgment on these matters, just curious really as to what OGs have seen around here. Are there other areas that have saved you money, but harmed a larger sale later? This information is very helpful for me to share with clients when value engineering and designing the space.