Whether you run cold calling, texting or direct mail, at some point you put a price in front of a seller. You either give a specific number, or a range. Most people pick based on what feels right, instead, it should be backed by data. It comes down to how tightly clustered land prices are in the acreage band you're targeting. If it's a narrow window, one number lands close enough for most owners on your list. If prices are scattered, one number is wildly wrong for half of them. The only owners who accept a number that's too high are the ones whose land is worth less than your number. So the marketing looks like it's working. You're chatting to sellers, you get contracts, then the comps come back and nothing closes. That was never a marketing problem. Mail is where this has the biggest impact because the number is printed and you're committed. On a call you can adjust based on the research you've done. Pull sold comps in your acreage band. Strip the outliers first, because MLS data mislabels houses as land and junk parcels drag the floor down. Next, you compare your highest price per acre to your lowest. If the high value is roughly double the low value, it's narrow enough for one number, eg. $3,000 to $6,000 an acre. If the variance is higher, like $3,000 to $15,000, a single number won't hold. Vote below. What does your marketing put in front of the seller?