Are you in a position to post the link to the $37/month AI Advantage Club? Where can we find it? Special Pre-Training #3 - AI Advantage Summit with Tony Robbins & Dean Graziosi

First Three Chapters? Where can we find it? Special Pre-Training #3 - AI Advantage Summit with Tony Robbins & Dean Graziosi

First Three Chapters? Where can we find it? Special Pre-Training #3 - AI Advantage Summit with Tony Robbins & Dean Graziosi

The number one thing I want from AI is to establish authority that supports a free-paid membership base of a Skool community. The path is to create AI-driven content generation, creation, publication, and analysis tools for publication of long-form YouTube videos and short-form content for TT, IG, and other SM platforms with the ultimate goal of creating authority that supports a large free and paid member-base for a Skool community. I’m new to CC, but I invested 4-5 hours training CC on my preferences and my stack. I was successful in creating a skill to generate YT scripts that meet criteria and a skill to generate prompts for each script for creating images (in Leonardo.ai) so that every 5-8 seconds, I have a new custom image to match the script. I also created and saved to CC a 90-day plan for establishing authority to support my Skool community

A lot of teams think AI adoption has to begin with a major initiative. They assume it needs a strategy deck, a sweeping rollout, a big announcement, or a fully formed transformation plan before anything meaningful can happen. But in practice, that is rarely how real momentum starts. Most teams that are getting value from AI are not winning because they began bigger. They are winning because they began smaller. They found one repeated task, improved one workflow, saved one useful prompt, tightened one handoff, and turned that small gain into a repeatable system. That matters because small systems reduce time-to-value much faster than big ambitions do. ------------- Big intentions often create slow adoption ------------- When teams talk about AI in broad terms, the conversation can sound exciting but still go nowhere. People discuss possibilities, future use cases, competitive pressure, and all the ways work might change. But because the scope feels so large, no one knows exactly where to start. That is one reason big transformation language can actually slow adoption. It creates pressure without giving people a clear path. The topic becomes important enough to talk about, but too abstract to use. And when something feels abstract, it usually stays separate from daily work. This is where many teams lose time. They spend weeks discussing AI at a high level while the real opportunities are sitting in plain sight inside recurring tasks. A bloated workflow. A repeated handoff. A first draft that always starts from scratch. A review process that keeps creating the same delay. None of these problems require a grand transformation to improve. They require a usable system. AI becomes valuable when it stops being a topic and starts becoming part of how work moves. ------------- Tiny systems create faster time-to-value ------------- A tiny system is not complicated. It is simply a repeatable way of using AI to reduce friction in a task that happens often enough to matter. That could be a prompt template for weekly updates, a checklist for reviewing drafts, a workflow for turning notes into a client follow-up, or a standard structure for summarizing research.