Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

Liberty Politics Discussion

4.2k members • Free

15 contributions to Liberty Politics Discussion
Here is the ceasefire reason:
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/17nXXKaBGA/?mibextid=wwXIfr
0
0
Current talks
So, I think most of us worried when we heard there would be negotiations instead of continued bombing. I certainly did and I think Armin did as well. Part of this is because the opposition controlled the narrative for well over half a day after the announcement. But now, I think this is probably a good thing. I will begin by stating my big concern. I want to see the US and Israel provide support from above when the Iranians come out. Because the regime still has the ability to oppress. And to kill people who come out to protest. Therefore I do not want to see any sort of peace deal that leaves the people completely without support from the US or Israel. We need to both supply them with equipment and also be ready if they come out to support them. So that is my main concern about a deal. I'm not really worried about the cease fire, but about a bad deal. Or one that is not effective at achieving regime change. The alternative was to destroy so much infrastructure that Iran essentially could not function on any level, and give the regime a choice between surrender and ruling over nothing. By contrast, we've now seen that: America is sticking to its red lines about nuclear and other conditions that Armin has repeatedly said the regime cannot agree to, at least not without totally losing its little remaining support. Witkoff even came out and said the Iranian demands are ridiculous. They should have said this right away though. The thing is that Trump likes to negotiate in secret. Which is fine in private stuff, but is not as good in politics where image matters, because it means he loses control of opinion. America is stabilizing the straight and will be in a position to keep the straight open when this falls apart in a couple of weeks. Just by talking, the regime is already fracturing and losing support. We also get to lower oil prices. Pakistan managed to make this entire thing into a hilarious clusterfuck by telling both sides different things. Why anyone thought Pakistan would be a good choice for negotiator is beyond me.
0 likes • 11h
@Daniel Bell I had the same thought except it was poison. Let’s get whoever is left together to negotiate and then off all of them.
1 like • 9h
@Daniel Bell I don’t know how it makes a difference if it’s bombs killing them or poison. The whole point would be to remove the obstacle to Iranians regaining control. These vile men are an obstacle and they do not deserve for us to play fair after all they have done.
Understanding Iran
Anyone who wants to understand Iran must know a bit about its history, and about these two topics in particular: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1953_Iranian_coup_d'état https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAVAK
0 likes • 10h
“History is the propaganda of the victors.” - Ernst Toller (said during Nazi rule)
Reza Pahlavi visits Swedish Parliament.
So Reza Pahlavi is visiting Sweden next Monday where he will be presenting a speech. Now some of you have spoken some concerns about the security situation in the Swedish Parliament. I found a video where you can get to go through all the different steps when you’re going to visit the parliament of Sweden. The video is in Swedish, but we are a few people that can translate in the group so just comment, and we will help you out.
1 like • 10h
@Nina M Sjöstedt I agree that it’s so important for people to hear what he says. I see the most ignorant comments from people about him, evidence most people don’t know anything about him or what he stands for. Being invited also gives him legitimacy as a leader which will give him influence and establish his role as the leader of Iran in diplomatic ways. As a person in the West, I do not recognize the legitimacy of the Islamic regime, but rather acknowledge him as the true leader of Iran.
Tag Yourselves
I have 4 points: > Is a Jew > supports Israel > is a Zionist > has kissed the f*cking wall
Tag Yourselves
0 likes • 10h
I only got three points!!! Not fair. > Married to a Jew > supports Israel > is a Zionist
1-10 of 15
Amber Mack
3
43points to level up
@amber-mack-6346
Javid Shah

Active 5h ago
Joined Apr 7, 2026
Powered by