Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

Burstiness and Perplexity

283 members • Free

Local AI Visibility Central

417 members • Free

15 contributions to Local AI Visibility Central
Did Feb hit your rankings? Read this.
Let me tell you what just happened to a LOT of websites last month. Good sites. Sites with real content written by real humans. Sites that were doing everything "right." They woke up in February and their visibility had fallen off a cliff. No warning. No manual penalty. No obvious reason. Turns out the problem was not their content. It was not AI. It was not even a "quality" issue. It was their Table of Contents. Yeah. That helpful little jump menu at the top of blog posts and service pages. Google started treating every single one of those #anchor links as a separate page. So your one great page suddenly looked like a dozen duplicate pages to Google. And instead of just ignoring the extras — it punished the whole site. Here is what to do RIGHT NOW if you have long-form pages with a TOC: Stop the bleeding: Remove the clickable jump links from your Table of Contents. Just delete the linked list at the top. Keep your headings exactly where they are — those are still helping you. The clickable links are causing the problem. Check the damage: Go into Search Console. Performance. Filter pages containing the # symbol. If you see a bunch of impressions on those URLs with almost zero clicks — that is your smoking gun. Going forward: If you want a TOC for your readers, it needs to be built with JavaScript so Google cannot see the links. More on this soon. Your H2 and H3 headings are still doing great work for you. AI models love them. Google needs them for context. Just stop giving the crawler extra URLs to choke on. Simple fix. Big impact. Do me a favor — go check your Search Console right now and drop a comment letting us know what you found. Even if it is clean, that is worth knowing too. And if you have already seen weird ranking drops in February and could not figure out why — this might be your answer. Hit reply and tell me what you are seeing.
1 like • 18d
@Lauren Luedke , I guess it also means SEO death of all fancy single page websites.
1 like • 18d
@Mike Clay , sorry, I meant what's Google's gain killing one of the oldest HTML tag, the foundation of them all... NRN
I wonder if anyone would want to use this...
What if your analytics didn't just track clicks—but clarity? - What if you could see where your marketing content hits a wall in the customer journey—and what happens next? - What if instead of generic “traffic,” you could pinpoint business lift—down to the page, message, or moment? - What if you knew exactly which content clusters need more oomph, which should be sunsetted, and which are quietly driving ROI? - And... what if you had something like a “Marketing Brain” that didn’t just show you everything... but helped you know where to focus now? We're building something. It’s not just analytics. It's Reality, for marketers who are done guessing. What would it change for you... if your data could finally tell the truth?Not just about traffic—but about traction.About truth.About what’s really working—and what’s not. 👉 Drop a comment:If your analytics could answer one impossible question about your marketing, what would it be? We’re listening. Because we’re building something that listens better than anything before it.
I wonder if anyone would want to use this...
1 like • Jan 8
The biggest time sink is finding new ways to segment your existing traffic across several dimensions you don't originally consider at the onset. A restless AI let loose on the good data might just do the trick.
OFFICE HOURS TODAY. LAST ONE OF 2025
TOAYS OFFICE HOURS: From Invisible to Irresistible: How to Get Cited by AI in 2026 Today we are going to go through my last 3 months of research. What We will cover - The Truth as it stands today about AI and SEO - 3 Immediate Wins w/ high impact tactics - a 30-day Action Plan Everyone tells you to 'optimize for AI.' Nobody shows you HOW to see what AI is actually searching for. 11am PST 2pm EST
1 like • Jan 4
@Mike Clay , sorry to bother you on Sunday: have I missed your replay post or you're working on it?
0 likes • Jan 4
@Mike Clay , Thank you!
Your opinion on Xagio and SeoNeo?
Have anyone worked with the latest iteration of these tools (Xagio and SEONEO)? What's your opinion? Do they make your work easier or it's just a huge time sink with the learning curve?
0 likes • Dec '24
Not yet, @Jason Yesser . I'm mulling over the seoneo and am 50% sure I'm gonna get it :-) Yes, it's old school but the amount of automation built-in in those campaigns should save a lot of time managing good number of clients. And something has to feed those Tier 1 and 2...
1 like • Sep '25
@Mike Clay , I ran a project with seoneo with nearly disastrous results. Their machinery works as advertised but at the end it yields a lot of automated spam and junk. Got rid of it.
Confusion on GEO / POI articles
I have had a handfull of questions about GEO / POI articles So I put outlines of how to do them in the Foundation Rank Course
0 likes • Sep '25
@Mike Clay , where are the outlines in the Course exactly? I can't find them...
1 like • Sep '25
of course😎... Thank you
1-10 of 15
Alex Wertheim
3
33points to level up
@alex-wertheim-3960
Brand development for SMBs.

Active 2h ago
Joined Nov 14, 2024
Powered by