27d • General discussion
Best-Fit Personality Preference Lab: group members' experiences
A few different things showed up across these conversations:
- A confirmed type tested against real evidence instead of accepted at face value, then run alongside other personal development work to see what it added.
- A confirmed type that held up specifically because the conversation reflected someone's own words back to them, rather than just agreeing with their self-assessment.
- A long-standing pattern someone had lived with for years getting explained for the first time through a personality lens.
- Real skepticism going in, followed by a result clear enough that the person said they could feel it.
- A suspected type tested against an alternative across two separate sessions, landing somewhere different than the original guess.
's conversation is the one I want to spend the most time on. She came in already confirmed on her type, not looking for a new label. What she wanted to test was more specific: whether her personality pattern actually explained the strategies that had worked for her, and the ones that hadn't. That's a different question than "what am I." She said afterward the conversation reminded her of who she is, which was the actual goal, not a new discovery. She came back to it later and ran it alongside other personal work she's doing (a Future Self exercise, some Internal Family Systems work), and said it brought out dynamics the other two hadn't gotten to on their own.
's experience landed closer to confirmation, and she was specific about why it held up. She'd already settled on ENFJ, but the way the conversation reflected her answers back to her (a "what I heard you say" pattern she and her husband have used since premarriage counseling, by her account) is what made the result feel accurate rather than just agreeable. The clarifying questions are what got her there, not the conclusion itself.
's ENFJ result tracked a different pattern. Once she trusts a framework, she's fully in, no hedging. That explained something she'd been living with for years without naming it. Going through several professional color analyses chasing the "right" one wasn't indecision. It was the same trait showing up before she had a framework she trusted enough to stop testing.
and both went in with some skepticism, for different reasons. Amanda's conversation landed on INFP clearly enough that she said she could feel it. Kiersten was upfront that she doesn't enjoy talking to AI generally, and expected the kind of answer that sounds thoughtful and says nothing. She came back twice, tested a suspected ISTJ pattern against ISFJ, and landed on ISFJ instead. The tool held the comparison open instead of settling on the first guess.
Different starting points, but the same thing held across all five conversations: a type result is only useful if you can recognize the pattern as your own. That's the same test that matters on the color side. What mattered each time wasn't the label itself. It was what the pattern explained about how someone actually uses a result once they have it.
If you haven't tried it yet: bestfitlab.netlify.app. If you have, I'd like to hear what came up. Drop it below or DM me.
1
0 comments
Best-Fit Personality Preference Lab: group members' experiences
powered by
skool.com/the-color-typology-lab-7535
Exploring personality type and the implementation of personal color analysis results. MBTI, Enneagram, OCEAN, and color frameworks.
Suggested communities
Powered by