User
Write something
Pinned
🗂️ Meeting Gravity, Using AI to Reduce Meeting Hours and Handoff Latency
Meetings are rarely the real problem. The real problem is what meetings are compensating for: unclear context, scattered information, slow decisions, and fragile handoffs. When we lack shared clarity, we reach for synchronous time because it feels safer. But that safety is expensive. A 30-minute meeting often costs 90 minutes once we account for prep, context switching, and follow-up. AI helps us reclaim time by making work more “async-ready.” When information is packaged well and decisions are made with clear inputs, we can reduce meeting hours without losing alignment. We do not remove communication, we redesign it so it wastes fewer hours. ------------- Context: Why Meetings Keep Expanding Even When We Do Not Want Them ------------- Most of us have felt the creep. A weekly sync becomes twice a week. A quick check-in gains an agenda, then a recurring invite. We tell ourselves the meetings are necessary, but often they are a symptom of a deeper time leak: the system cannot move work forward without real-time coordination. Meetings expand when: - People cannot find the latest context quickly. - Decisions are unclear, so we talk instead of choose. - Handoffs are messy, so we “walk through it” live. - Accountability is fuzzy, so we meet to feel progress. - Uncertainty rises, so we sync to reduce anxiety. The result is meeting gravity. Work gets pulled into the calendar. Deep work gets squeezed into the margins. Context switching frequency spikes, and the day becomes fragmented. Fragmentation is where our hours vanish, not because we are doing nothing, but because we cannot finish anything in one focused block. A micro-scenario: a cross-functional project with marketing, product, and sales. Everyone wants alignment, so they meet. But the meetings keep recurring because the handoffs between groups are unclear. After each call, people leave with different interpretations, and new questions arise. The team spends more time coordinating than producing. This is where the time mindset matters. Meetings are a resource like money. If we spend them without ROI, we are burning the team’s attention budget.
🗂️ Meeting Gravity, Using AI to Reduce Meeting Hours and Handoff Latency
Pinned
Quick Check In
It’s almost March. Be honest. Are you still going after the goals you set in January…or have you quietly adjusted them to feel more comfortable? This is the part of the year nobody talks about. The hype is gone. The excitement faded. Now it’s just discipline. At some point it stops being about motivation. It becomes about keeping your word to yourself. So I’ll ask you straight: Are you growing into who you said you wanted to become this year? 👇 Where are you at right now...crushing it, coasting, or recalibrating?
Pinned
The Best Free AI Got a MASSIVE Upgrade & More AI News You Can Use
This week, I break down some huge updates to Claude that, combined with the introduction of ads in ChatGPT, make Claude the best AI if you're on a free plan. Plus, I cover the barrage of OpenAI news and releases, discusses the evolution of the "OpenClaw" movement, and more. Enjoy!
BILLING? AIA am I paying for SKOOL for this community?
AIA am I paying for SKOOL for this community? If so, why, how much and since when? RSVP THX
A Fun Little Exercise...
The team and I did this and some of the results were very interesting! Go into ChatGPT and post this prompt: "Based on all the conversations we've had, can you analyze my behavioural tendencies. Keep it short and concise" Post your response in the comments below and let us know if any of it was a surprise to you! Here is mine: Here are the behavioural tendencies you consistently show in our chats: - Iterative builder: You like shipping a version, then tightening it fast with specific edits and constraints. - Framework-first thinker: You gravitate toward checklists, systems, repeatable steps, and clear structure over vague advice. - High signal standards: You push for longer, fuller answers with real substance, not surface-level answers. - Precision + optimisation bias: Whether it’s macros, pricing, positioning, or scripts, you like measurable targets and tuning variables. - Creative but directed: You enjoy big imaginative swings, but you still want them organized and usable. - Action orientation: You regularly steer toward “what do I do next” and practical outputs you can deploy immediately.
A Fun Little Exercise...
1-30 of 11,585
The AI Advantage
skool.com/the-ai-advantage
Founded by Tony Robbins, Dean Graziosi & Igor Pogany - AI Advantage is your go-to hub to simplify AI and confidently unlock real & repeatable results
Leaderboard (30-day)
Powered by