User
Write something
Pinned
Each dot is 3.2 million people.
📊 You've probably seen this chart floating around LinkedIn and Twitter Each dot is 3.2 million people. ⬜ Grey is the 84% of humans who have never used AI 🟩 Green is the 16% who have used a free chatbot 🟨 Yellow is the 0.3% who pay for one 🟥 Red is the tiny sliver who use AI coding tools Most of the people sharing it have not actually said what it means. So here it is. 🔁 We live inside an algorithm. Mine shows me AI all day. Yours probably does too. Every reel, every post, every podcast clip, every ad. The feed makes it feel like the whole world has moved on without you and you are sprinting to keep up. Inside Clief Notes that feeling gets louder. You log in and see people building agents, shipping side projects, automating their inbox, talking about Claude Code and MCP servers like it is normal. In this room, it is. Step outside and almost nobody is doing any of it. 6.8 billion people have never opened a chatbot. Plenty of the ones who did opened it once, asked it something dumb, got a dumb answer, and decided the whole thing sucked. They are not coming back this year. Maybe not next year either. 🪖 When I was in the Marine Corps I never felt like I was doing anything special. I was surrounded by other Marines. Everyone around me could do what I could do. The standard was the standard. It was not until I left and stood next to people who had never served that I understood. The thing I thought was ordinary was rare. I just could not see it because I was inside it. That is what is happening to you in here. If you feel behind in this community, that is the right feeling to have. It means you are standing next to the people pushing the edge. Step outside this room and the thing you are calling behind is so far ahead of where most of the world is sitting that they cannot see you from where they are. And do not forget. The thing you built last week, the workflow you set up this morning, the conversation you just had with Claude. A version of you from two years ago would have paid good money to do any of it.
Each dot is 3.2 million people.
Pinned
Welcome to Clief Notes. Here's where to start.
1. Watch the intro video and introduce yourself in the intro post here 2. Start with The Foundation (free course). Concepts, folder architecture, prompting framework. Everything else builds on this. 3. Check in at the bottom of each lesson. Polls, discussion posts, other members working through the same stuff. Use them. 4. When you're ready to build real things, move to Implementation Playbooks (Level 2). When you're ready to build your own tools, Building Your Stack (Level 3). 5. Post your work. Ask questions. Help others when you can. What are you here to build?
Poll
4068 members have voted
Pinned
🏆 Weekly Comp #2: The Artifact Sprint 🏆
💰 Week 1 winner @Ian Barriopedro took home $200 cash. 🎟️ This week the prize gets bigger. ✨ Winner gets a FREE seat in The Lyceum. ✨ https://www.skool.com/quantum-quill-lyceum-1116/12-weeks-real-projects-250k-in-prizes-lets-talk?p=e850567b 🎯 Pick your cohort: Technical, Business, or Creator. Your call. 📋 THE CHALLENGE: "The Returning Client" You just got hired again. Different client this time. Meet Marcus. 👋 📎 Download the full client brief attached to this post. 🛠️ YOUR DELIVERABLE An interactive artifact built in Claude that does what Marcus asked for. ✍️ Plus a 100 word writeup covering: - 👤 Who it's for - ⚙️ What it does - 🎨 One design choice you made and why 📐 THE RULES ✅ It has to work ✅ It has to sound like Marcus, not a bank ✅ The writeup matters ⚖️ Judging: Myself, Jake, and the mods. 🎟️ Who can enter: Premium and VIP members only. Free members, this is your sign. Upgrade and you're in the running for a Lyceum seat. 🚀 📨 How to submit: Drop a screen recording or screenshot of your artifact, the link if you've got one, and your writeup in the comments below. 📅 Deadline: Saturday, May 2nd at 12:00 PM EST 🎉 Winner announced: Monday, May 4th at 12:00 PM EST 💡 A note before you start. This isn't a finance challenge. It's a design and voice challenge. You don't need to be a CFP to win this. Read the brief. Marcus tells you exactly what he wants and how he thinks. Your job is to build something that solves his problem and sounds like him. 🆕 If you've never built an artifact in Claude before, this is a great first one. The brief is clear, the scope is reasonable, and the bar is "would Marcus actually send this to a prospect?" 🔥 @Ian Barriopedro set the standard last week. Your turn. LFG 🚀
As promised: The six-section brief that replaced every long chat prompt I wrote
Long prompts decay. You keep stuffing context into one chat window until the model is drowning in your own mess. The fix is not a better prompt. It is a brief written to disk. A brief is a contract. Any worker opens it cold, executes, hands back a result. No shared history. No "as we discussed earlier." The doc is the entire relationship. Here is the template I use. Six sections. Every brief has them. In this order. # <slug> cd <absolute path the worker starts in> ## Task One paragraph. The outcome. What "done" looks like in prose. ## Context Paths to files the worker needs. The spec. The design doc. The prior handoff. Anything not obvious from the codebase. ## Scope - In-scope: what the worker is allowed to touch - Out-of-scope: what the worker must not touch - Kill-switches: time or complexity thresholds that trigger a fallback ## Acceptance - Binary bullets. Either true or false. - Test counts. Commit messages. Evidence file path. - No subjective language. "Looks good" is not acceptance. ## Escalation One file path. If the worker hits ambiguity, it writes a question to this file and exits. Main session reads it on the next turn. ## Returns-with - Commit SHAs - Test pass count before and after - Wall-clock per major task - Final handoff doc path Why each section load-bears Task forces you to state the outcome in prose before a single line of code exists. If you cannot state it, the work is not ready to dispatch. Context is the line between a clean run and a hallucinated one. Never rely on the worker guessing which file you meant. Name the paths. Scope stops the worker sliding into adjacent work. In-scope is the yes list. Out-of-scope is the no list. Both matter. Kill-switches protect you from a worker burning six hours on the wrong branch. Acceptance is the section most people skip. Binary only. If you cannot write acceptance criteria, the work is not shaped yet. You are not ready to brief. Escalation is the pressure release valve. Without it, a stuck worker invents nonsense. With it, the worker writes a question file and exits clean. You read it on your next turn. No wasted tokens.
🏁 The Archive 1.1 Check-In
What brought you to this course? Vote below, then tell us in the comments
Poll
68 members have voted
1-30 of 859
Clief Notes
skool.com/quantum-quill-lyceum-1116
Jake Van Clief, giving you the Cliff notes on the new AI age.
Leaderboard (30-day)
Powered by