📅 DAY THREE DATA DROP — Visibility vs. Alignment

Mimi Ramsey

🔥

Nov 5 • The Experiment

📊 Dashboard Stats

👀 About-page visitors: 71

✍️ Signups: 25

⚡ Conversion rate: 35.21%

🏆 Discovery rank: #246 (up from #272 — nice climb)

💰 Paid members: 0 (nothing to sell in here)

🧩 Category:

🎨 Hobbies

🗣️ Language: EN

💬 Content Performance (Skool Feed vs Facebook)

Post 1: “You Don’t Hate Selling — You Hate the Bullsh*t That Masquerades as Selling…”

Skool: 7 likes | 13 comments

Facebook: 259 views | 7 reactions | 0 comments | £0.02 payout from FB

Reflection:This post lit up Skool, sparking genuine conversation and relatability — people got it.On Facebook, though, it was seen but didn’t move anyone enough to engage.

That says a lot about audience alignment: Skool readers are connecting to depth, not just content.

Post 2: “Let’s Be Havin’ It — What Seriously Gets on Your Tits About Social Media?”

Skool: 6 likes | 14 comments (and actual dialogue!)

Facebook: 233 views | 0 reactions | £0.04 payout from FB

Reflection:Zero engagement on Facebook despite being seen — and even paid out a few pennies.

Meanwhile, the Skool thread blew up with raw, real conversation.

People weren’t just agreeing — they were adding.

This is the kind of two-way visibility that matters.

🧠 Insights

Facebook = views without voice.
Skool = voice without vanity metrics.
Engagement here feels intentional — fewer eyes, stronger connection.
This proves that when people come to your owned feed, they’re not scrolling; they’re showing up to participate.

⚙️ Next Steps

→ Keep tracking the conversation-to-view ratio (depth > reach).

→ Begin noting which topics trigger dialogue — emotional honesty, raw truths, real business talk.

→ Prep for Day 4: add a new “Engagement Efficiency” column to measure resonance vs. visibility.

💬 Takeaway

“It’s not about how many saw it. It’s about how many felt it.”

📅 Day 3 — logged.

2 comments