This is an update on my first post here https://www.skool.com/cliefnotes/icm-for-teams-my-understanding-to-onboarding-coworkers-to-a-shared-content-pipeline?p=03813a63. And thanks to solid inputs by @Curtis Hays, i decided to do an update. This is a more robust and scalable way to run a shared ICM content system with multiple people. It works especially well for teams. Why This Approach? - Everyone has their own private workspace, so there is no risk of stepping on each other's drafts. - There is still one source of truth for the shared framework, rules, and client info. - Merge conflicts are much less likely. - It is easy to pick up someone's work if they are absent. Overall Structure The use two types of repositories. 1. Shared Repo (one for the whole team) Contains: - Framework, rules, prompts, and stages - Client information and brand guidelines - Shared logs Does not contain personal ideas or drafts. 2. Personal Repo (one for each person) Contains: - Your own `stage folder e.g 01-ideas`, `02-drafts`, `03-formats`, and working content Fully private to you. Step by Step Setup Guide For You (The Person Who Built the Original System) Step 1: Create the Shared Framework Repo 1. Create a new private GitHub repository e.g `marketing-content-framework`. 2. Copy only the framework files into it: - `agent.md` / `CLAUDE.md` - `context.md` - Core stages and context contracts - Brand guidelines, rules, templates - Any shared client projects or logs folder 3. Add a `.gitignore`. Example: ```gitignore # Ignore personal content folders 01-ideas/ 02-drafts/ 03-formats/ *.local.md ``` 4. Push it to GitHub. Step 2: Create Your Personal Repo 1. Create another private repo e.g `yourname-content-workspace`. 2. Clone the shared framework into it, or copy the structure. 3. This becomes your main working folder.

Been thinking through limits of AI. It seems to me that AI does not have a body and thus cannot become self-aware. It has no self to become aware of, no embodied point of view. AI does not have emotions and does not want to have sex and reproduce as humans do. so it's intelligence has no innate purpose (as near as I can tell)...or perhaps better said, it will be/is an intelligence that will not work on a human scale? I am new to writing about AI. And, as you can guess by presence here, use LLMS every day. I think about these ideas daily as I teach somatics - detailed, highly-unique movements that give feedback to the nervous system and increase self-awareness. Might sound flakey, but it is based on some simple nervous symptom properties such as various Fechner-Weber properties and just noticable diffferences. I have a short, audio and email based course if anyone wants it: https://www.ryannagy.com/ I created the sessions more than a decade before even thinking about AI. Peace!