Curious how others are handling file links in ICM-style workspaces, especially if you’re also using Obsidian for visual navigation.
I’ve been trying to keep links functional instead of decorative. My current pattern is:
- Index = where this file primarily belongs
- Links = closely related files worth navigating with it
- Source Of Truth / Pointer / Route To = operational links, not just visual links
- Avoid inter-linking every mentioned file, because the graph gets noisy fast
- Only add links when they help with routing, ownership, review, or resume context
So the goal is not “maximum backlinks.” We want a graph that shows how the workspace actually operates.
As I see it: Obsidian rewards dense linking visually, but ICM rewards narrow context loading. Too many links can make the graph pretty but semantically weak.
How are you all deciding what deserves a link vs what should stay plain text?