Good points, all. I totally get where you're coming from. I have a Clawdbot but: 1. It is NOT on Moltbook 2. nor is it using the heartbeat feature 3. it will stay nerfed until a few more hardening patches drop

Love this take—and I’m mostly with you, with a small but important twist based on how my workflow has evolved. If I had to pick one, Claude Code is still my daily driver. I’ve been using it for almost everything for months now, and for the same reasons you laid out: when you treat it like an engineer instead of a genie, it’s incredibly dependable. Tight scopes, mini-PRDs, curated context, explicit constraints—it rewards discipline. That reliability matters once a project crosses the line from vibe coding into something you actually intend to ship, maintain, and reason about later. That said, I’ve started layering in OpenCode, and that’s where things get interesting for me. What I really like about OpenCode is the flexibility. Being able to switch models depending on the task—exploration vs refactor vs review vs “sanity check this architectural direction”—has real value. I don’t think one model is objectively best at everything, and OpenCode makes that an intentional choice instead of an accidental one. Claude Code is still my default execution engine, but OpenCode has become a great control panel. The bigger shift, though, is that I’m no longer thinking in terms of a single agent. Lately I’ve been running multiple agents simultaneously, using different setups: Claude bots for focused execution, Agent Flywheel–style loops for iteration and synthesis, and now Codex increasingly as a long-running, big-picture agent. That’s where Codex has surprised me. I don’t reach for it for tight diff-level work or fast iteration—but for “hold the whole system in your head, reason over time, and help me not paint myself into a corner,” it’s starting to shine. So my answer is less “Claude Code vs X” and more: - Claude Code → precision execution, structured shipping - OpenCode → model agility and task-fit flexibility - Codex → strategic continuity and long-horizon reasoning The real bottleneck for me right now isn’t accuracy or refactors—it’s coordination: keeping intent, architecture, and momentum aligned as complexity grows. Single-agent workflows strain there. Multi-agent setups feel like the next unlock.

Here's a live test drive... https://www.skool.com/vibe-coders/daily-vibe-what-this-is-and-why-were-doing-it?p=6385d356

@Jacob P yeah I thought it would have ALL of Claude code's features but with the benefit of Claude desktop's UI, but that's not really the case. There's no way (that I could find at the time) to add skills to a .claude skills folder and have it use them. Everything runs in a fresh mounted sandbox session with no preset /commands or /skills (that I could find). I never got to the bottom of how it intends to integrate skills because the second it didn't work I just went straight back to Claude Code 'cause I had work to do! :)