Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

Elite Careers Strategy Gateway

2.8k members • Free

1 contribution to Elite Careers Strategy Gateway
What most students at elite universities get wrong about elite law applications.
They treat their university brand as the strategy. Firms don’t. Here’s the reality (and what you should actually do): 1. Firms recruit for outcomes, not optics. Slaughter and May hires from 70+ universities . White & Case says 80% of its trainees come via vacation schemes — not brand-name CVs . Your task is to prove you can deliver under pressure. Action: Show proof of outcome — quantify your achievements using the VTMR™ Formula (Verb–Task–Metric–Result). 2. Generic answers kill applications. Recruiters at Linklaters and White & Case openly reject cover letters that could be copy-pasted to another firm . Action: Apply the PEAL-X™ Framework. Every sentence must contain a firm-specific fact — a deal, client, ranking, or sector. 3. Commercial fluency beats academic polish. Clifford Chance explicitly values intellectual agility and the ability to discuss commercial issues, not just legal theory . Action: Train with STAR-3™ — structure competency answers around Situation, Task, Action, and 3 Results (deal, client, and personal outcome). 💡 At City Careers Coach, this approach has delivered a 95% offer benchmark across flagship clients — including White & Case, Ropes & Gray, and Sidley Austin. University prestige may open the inbox. Framework-based execution secures the offer.
What most students at elite universities get wrong about elite law applications.
1 like • 20d
I'd like to learn more about these actions/methods/strategies (VTMR, etc.).
1-1 of 1
Wendyl Luna
1
4points to level up
@wendyl-luna-3959
Penultimate year JD student at UNSW, hoping to make it to one of the BigLaw firms.

Active 16d ago
Joined Nov 24, 2025
Powered by