Been running the same AI content system for a client for a few months now. Not every reel goes viral, most don't, but the ones that hit show what consistency actually does over time. 3 reels from the same account, different weeks One hit 5.2M views, 93.9% of that from people who'd never seen the account before. Another brought in 4 clients off a single reel, $25,800 total. A smaller one did 121K views and picked up 918 new followers. No editors, no script writers, just the system posting consistently and letting the ones that land actually land. Not every post is a home run. That's normal. But when you're consistent enough, the wins start showing up more often. If you're curious what this could look like for your own content, happy to walk you through it, drop a comment or DM me.

OpenAI renamed GPT-5.6's tiers — Sol, Terra, Luna and this time the names actually tell you something instead of making you decode a version number ⬩➤Sol — the flagship, priced accordingly. Hard coding, security work, multi-step problems. ⬩➤Terra — the everyday one. Roughly half Sol's cost, fine default for most business stuff. ⬩➤Luna — cheap and fast. Summaries, drafts, the routine stuff nobody wants to pay flagship prices for. It's similar to Claude's Opus, Sonnet and Haiku The interesting bit is a comparison someone ran: a full day testing Sol against Claude Fable 5 on actual tasks games, websites, coding, brainstorming not benchmark screenshots Fable came out ahead creatively Better games, better site designs, more polish, more willingness to push back on a bad idea instead of just executing it Sol came out ahead on speed and cost, no contest One project: Sol did it in 7 minutes for about a dollar Fable took 20 minutes and almost $20 for a comparable result Which one's better probably isn't the right question It's what you're optimizing for that day Fable if you want the strongest output and don't mind paying for it, Sol if "good enough, fast and cheap" actually is good enough Feels like the obvious move is using both: Fable to think it through, Sol to actually build it

Anthropic released a guide called "The founder's playbook: Building an Al-native startup" In this playbook, they share: - How to validate a problem hypothesis, map a competitive landscape, and run customer discovery with Al Architecture, scope, and security practices that keep Al-generated MVP codebases from accruing technical debt - A measurement framework for distinguishing genuine product-market fit from early hype - A Launch-stage operating system that replaces founder attention with agentic workflows - A product matrix for when and how to use Chat, Claude Cowork, and Claude Code across each stage of the startup journey - Founder stories from Ambral, Anything, Carta Healthcare, HumanLayer, Vulcan Technologies, and more! https://claude.com/blog/the-founders-playbook

Your project grew big Now every small change means Claude Code re reads half your codebase just to remember what it already knew yesterday It is like hiring a smart assistant who forgets your entire company structure every single morning. You explain the org chart again. You explain who reports to who again. By the time they start actual work, half the day is gone That re reading is not free It is tokens and time, burned before Claude even touches your actual request The fix that is going viral right now is called Second Brain Instead of Claude re reading files every session, you build a graph of your project once Claude reads that graph instead of the raw codebase No more rediscovering the same structure again and again It shines on large, complex projects People are seeing 35 to 40 percent improvement in speed and token cost It is an open source solution, sitting at 79.7k stars on GitHub already Click here -> second brain If your project has outgrown "just read the files," this is worth 10 minutes to set up Anyone here already running a second brain setup with Claude Code? Curious what changed for you

Like cold email outreach, can we use whatsapp messages campaign?? Any problem with this outreach??