Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

Quit The Fog

208 members • Free

Elite Sales Alliance

22k members • Free

Imperium Academy™

60.1k members • Free

Brand Starter (Free)

2.9k members • Free

Growth Elite by Perspective

5k members • Free

AI Agency Owners W/ Sayed

1.8k members • Free

Agency Owners

19.6k members • Free

🎵 Music Funding Academy

687 members • Free

Ecomliberty

45.6k members • Free

12 contributions to Lead Generation Secrets
The Lead Data Crisis 🤯
In 2026, the hardest part of cold email isn't writing emails. It's finding clean data. You can have the best copywriter in the world. The perfect subject line. A killer offer. None of it matters if your data is garbage. And right now? Most people's data IS garbage. Here's what I see over and over again: → Bad lead data → high bounce rates → domain damage → Wrong contacts (you're emailing the office manager, not the decision maker) → Overlapping databases (Apollo + Apollo + Apollo = the same burned contacts) → Cheap scraped lists with zero verification People try to save $200/month on leads… then spend $2,000 replacing burned domains and rebuilding infrastructure. Good data is expensive. Burned infrastructure is MORE expensive. Let that sink in. Here's what's actually working right now: The people getting results aren't relying on one tool. They're running a data hygiene stack: - Base Data: Apollo / Sales Navigator → starting point for contacts - Clay → layering in job titles, company size, tech stack, intent signals - Verification: MillionVerifier / Reoon → cleaning out invalid emails BEFORE they hit your sender (btw you can build your own email verifier, check this) - Google / LinkedIn check → for high-value prospects, verify manually - Custom Scraping: For niche industries where databases are actually clean The niche scraping play is underrated. Here's why: Industries like local services, manufacturing, construction, and geo-technical companies aren't getting blasted by every SDR with an Apollo login. Those databases are cleaner because the competition isn't there. Everyone's fighting over the same SaaS founders and marketing directors. Meanwhile, the people targeting old-school industries are getting 10%+ reply rates because their leads haven't been emailed 47 times this month. The real cost breakdown nobody talks about: Most people think cold email costs = software + sending tool.
0 likes • Mar 10
Leads
I Stopped Sending Looms. Replies Went Up.
Alright, I want to break down a strategy that used to work insanely well, stopped working for most people, and is now quietly working again if you apply it the right way. You’ll probably recognize this. A few years ago, Loom videos crushed. You’d send a cold email like: “Hey, mind if I record you a quick Loom?” They’d say yes. You’d spend 10 minutes recording a custom video. Send it over. Replies would spike. Why did it work? It worked because it felt 1-to-1. The prospect believed you sat down, thought about them, and made something specifically for their business. That’s the psychology. Now here’s the problem: Doing this at scale is brutal. Recording 10 minutes per prospect doesn’t scale past a handful of leads a day. So people abandoned it. Big mistake. The strategy didn’t stop working. The format did. Instead of sending a Loom, you switch the deliverable. Here’s what works now: You ask permission to do research, not a video. Something like: “Would it be useful if I put together a quick breakdown of your company vs competitors? I can send it over in 24 hours.” That’s it. What happens in their head: – “They’re going to spend time on me” And that’s the win. Now the real unlock: You don’t actually need to do this manually. With automation, you can generate: – mini audits – competitor snapshots – opportunity breakdowns – teardown-style reports All personalized, fast and scalable. From the prospect’s perspective, it feels just as personal as the old Loom videos. From your side, you’re not burning 10 minutes per lead. This is what I call a reverse lead magnet. Instead of giving away a generic PDF to everyone, you offer something that appears custom first, then deliver it at scale. If you want to see exactly how I set it up… Comment “Reverse” and I’ll break it down.
0 likes • Mar 10
Reverse
The $1.50/mailbox cold email infrastructure I use to send 100K+ emails monthly
Hey everyone 👋 I've been meaning to share this with the community for a while now, and I figured it's time to stop gatekeeping this resource. Quick context: When I scaled our PR agency to $800K/month, one of the biggest operational costs was email infrastructure. At $8/mailbox on Google Workspace, running 300+ mailboxes was costing us $2,400/month just in mailbox fees. The alternative I found: There's a category of SMTP services with unmanaged IP addresses that cost $1-1.50 per mailbox/month. I'm currently running 375 active mailboxes across 75 domains through one of these services. What you get: • Unlimited scaling potential • 3-click setup process • Direct export into Instantly • Professional SMTP infrastructure • Full domain ownership and control The important caveat (please read): This is NOT for beginners. Here's why: With Google/Microsoft, they manage IP reputation for you. With these SMTP services, YOU are responsible for maintaining sender reputation. If you get spam complaints or hit spam traps, the entire IP range gets flagged and all your mailboxes go to spam. Who this is for: ✅ You already have a profitable cold email system with Google/Microsoft ✅ You consistently get low spam complaint rates ✅ You understand deliverability fundamentals ✅ You're ready to scale and reduce operational costs My current setup: I use this service alongside Google and Microsoft mailboxes to diversify infrastructure. When Google had those recent policy changes, my campaigns kept running because I wasn't 100% dependent on them. To get instant access to this: Comment "INBOX" below and I'll DM you the link 📦
0 likes • Dec '25
Inbox
1 like • Mar 10
Inbox
🛑 STOP! You Might Be Triggering the “Sales Alarm”
Most cold emails fail before the open. Because their subject line screams: “I’m about to sell you something.” And the brain deletes those instantly. Think about the usual ones: • “Quick question about your business” • “Interested in growing your revenue?” You already know it’s a pitch. So you never even open it. What actually works? Subject lines that feel normal. Like they could come from a colleague, partner, or someone you already know. Examples: • “Thoughts on this?” • “Saw your post about this” • “Chicago next week” • “Is this your competitor?” Nothing salesy. Just curiosity + relevance. And one thing most people miss 👇 Your first line matters just as much as the subject line. Those two lines together are the entire preview. If they feel generic → ignored If they feel human → opened The goal is simple: Make your email feel like a conversation Not a campaign If it could pass as a message from someone they already know… You’ve already won half the battle. Comment “Copy” and I’ll share the prompt I use to generate subject lines that actually get opened.
0 likes • Mar 10
Copy
Mailin.com - reviews?
Hi guys, is anyone using Mailin.com? How has your experience been with their mailboxes?
1-10 of 12
Tony Tamang
2
10points to level up
@tonir-tamang-1364

Active 2d ago
Joined Jun 30, 2025
Powered by