Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
What is this?
Less
More

Owned by Toivo

Cursor Skool

59 members • Free

Learn how to use Cursor - The #1 community for Cursor users

Rule Of 300 Club

9 members • Free

A club for everyone doing the Rule of 300

Memberships

Business by Faizal Siddiqui

1k members • Free

Valokuvaus

13 members • Free

Upwork Outbound (Free)

24.2k members • Free

Skool Add-ons

496 members • Free

Ai Freelancer

377 members • Free

AI App Builders

90 members • Free

Dev Skool Community

596 members • Free

Agent Zero

1.6k members • Free

Vibe Coding School

277 members • $30/m

32 contributions to Vibe Coders
Quickstart: BMAD Method for Vibe Coding
I made a quick video showing people how to get started vibe coding using a powerful method called "BMAD". This is the first lesson in a new course. More lessons to follow!
0 likes • 23d
What does the BMAD stand for?
0 likes • 1d
@Michal V Okay thanks! The acronym makes sense though I don't quite get what this means I'm quite familiar with Agile Development but I don't know how that ties into business modelling
Inside a FAANG Engineer's Workflow: AI-Assisted Dev in Practice
Hey all, I saw this Reddit post written by an experienced engineer at a big tech company. It gives a clear, practical overview on how AI (like copilots) is being integrated into real-world software engineering: everything from writing technical design docs, going through structured reviews, and incorporating test-driven development, to bringing in AI for implementation and testing. The author claims this workflow gives a solid productivity boost and enhances code quality. As a side note, some Reddit commenters discuss whether this counts as "vibe coding" or something like "AI-assisted development". I personally don't care but what do you think? Is this vibe coding or something else? Also, have you used a similar structured workflow or pipeline like this with AI tools or do you prefer a more exploratory, iterative style?
Poll
1 member has voted
0
0
Cursor 1.3 released
Cursor version 1.3 was released One of the best new features is seeing the context usage in Chat You can check out the full changelog here
3
0
Cursor 1.3 released
Reminder: Refactor your code
Inspired by the post by @Taj Sanders , I wanted to give everyone a reminder to regularly refactor your code Over time, AI gets your code to be a mess. So you should regularly ask it to clean it up Instead of asking AI to "refactor the code", ask it to: - Eliminate dead code: “Delete unused imports, variables, and functions; point out any test files that still call them.” - Kill duplication: “Detect code blocks duplicated ⩾ 3 times across modules; create a shared utility and update call sites.” - Improve architecture: "Identify features or sections of the app that could be extracted to a separate module." You can also use these to target a specific part of the application Note: the list is not exhaustive! Let me know if you want to know more about this
1 like • Jul 26
@Cheryl Tibbs I'm glad to hear that!
2 likes • Jul 26
@Yuri P. Yep this here is the correct answer Using AI to detect unused imports etc works but the correct long term solution is to use a linter. In the Python world, Ruff is great for formatting and linting. Vulture is very interesting for detecting unused code sections. Mypy or ty are good for type checks. I have set up Cursor on some projects to automatically run Ruff, check the errors and warnings, fix them, and repeat until there are no erorrs or warnings. This works beautifully for me. I like the snowball analogy. Then changing the project or adding new features is like steering the snowball. When it has a lot of mass, steering it becomes a lot harder, takes longer, and requires way more power. Refactoring is like shaving off snow from the snowball. Architectural refactoring would be like splitting the ball in two.
Big Dreams No Skills
Hey everyone. I'm building a chess app and I have spent $100's on Cursor and Bolt.new. I've been thinking about trying out lovable. I get off to a great start and then my apps fail and seem to get into an endless error loops which the AI can't seem to fix. Any advice for which platform I should be on or are they more or less the same?
1 like • Jul 17
The different tools do have different things they are good at, and depending on what you are building, you might get it done by just swapping the tool. But yes, all the tools are the same in one regard: they get the code tangled up. And yes, then they struggle a lot to develop the code further. In Cursor, I typically try to solve this by asking Cursor to refactor the code. This should make the code simpler and easier for the AI to handle. Should be similar with other tools as well. Please describe the app you are building in more detail. It's way easier to help that way. @Zac Frulloni might know if just switching to Lovable would solve this
1-10 of 32
Toivo Mattila
3
12points to level up
@toivo-mattila-6413
Software Engineer, MSc and 7 years professionally Now using Cursor to build better software faster

Active 6h ago
Joined May 23, 2025
Lahti, Finland
Powered by