https://typesafe.ai Ummm...I'm going to have to digest this one for a hot second. Wanted to post it here so my fellow geeks get a good look at it ASAP. Here's a video post on LinkedIn: https://lnkd.in/p/gRZrtHjt

I've been in Claude since early this year because, well, Claude was just better. Seems like a bunch of folks are jumping ship (back) to OpenAI with 5.6 and Astra releases. I haven't had the time to do any testing. What's your experience? Anyone compared the writing capabilities between the modern OpenAI models and say Opus 4.8 or Sonnet 5? I've started a 70 article series on Substack and LinkedIn so I'm not switching midstream for that. Just curious Ari convinced me to look at Grok 4.6 so I'm testing that as well but for coding only.

Three days into Implementation Playbooks. I want to know what came out of it. Not what you watched. Not what you understood. What did you actually MAKE? - An animation you finally got working? - A folder structure that finally makes sense for your AI setup? - A browser workflow that's saving time? - Or something else entirely? Drop it below. Doesn't matter how small. Some of the most useful things in here started as the smallest outputs. And if you got stuck on a step... Don't sit there spinning. - Bring it to the Clief Notes AI - Bring it to the next call - Go back to the lesson and figure out WHERE you got stuck. That's part of the build. The roadmaps aren't here to make you feel like you completed something. They're here to make sure you walk out the other side with something you can actually use. Drop what you built below. 👇

This is happening to me all the time now, and either I wasn't catching it before, or something changed. I do realize that this might be operator error, which is why I'm asking for help. Have you been able to wrangle the "hallucinations" which let's just call them what they are, fiction and/or lies. One request: please don't blindly copy/paste outputs if you run this post with AI. I'm not saying don't do that, just politely asking if you could give it a read and if the output makes sense to you, drop it in the comments. Here are two examples: --------------- Example #1 --------------- Had Claude draft this up, and in the process it created a rule for it without me asking. What's frustrating about this is that now I have to read through another markdown file to ensure accuracy and consistency to how I do things, and I still have doubt that it'll even honor the rule it wrote for itself. The admission: 1. What I did. Credited three voice rules to NAME, and wrote that he flagged them in a comment on your Voiceprint LinkedIn post. The comment doesn't exist. I checked his comments feed, his posts, Gmail, Slack, and Skool. The earliest trace is my own /session capture on 8/29, with nothing upstream of it. I can't reconstruct where the name came from, and I didn't invent a story for how I invented it. 2. It happened twice. Yesterday I told you the attribution had reached the public repo. It hadn't. I repeated the session log's "added all three to..." line without opening the file. That second one is the more useful failure, because it shows the actual mechanism: an unsourced sentence in a workspace file gets read as a source by whoever comes next, including me. 3. Six guardrails were loaded and all six missed. constraints.md bans invented attributions by name. Its final scan says every claim traces to a source. Shared rule 0 forces that file to load every EOD run. Root map rule 5 says verify the live system. Digirol bans "I think" and demands a real search before calling a contact new.

I am interested in connecting with other founders. I've connected with a few, but I suspect there are a few more hiding in here. To get the conversation going, can you share: - What company are you building? - What founder problem are you dealing with right now that ICM can't solve for you?