Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
What is this?
Less
More
Build Market Close

310 members • Free

Clief Notes

45.7k members • Free

Better ConnEQtions

16 members • Free

99 contributions to Clief Notes
What happened to Claude?
Anyone else frustrated with Claude lately? Opus 5 used to be so good, but now it's just one big mess. Am I tripping?
2 likes • 49m
Honestly, I am not sure why Claude, especially Claude Code has such high regard in programming circles. I have used ChatGPT Codex and Claude Code side by side for months, switching between the two when I hit the session limit in either, before I started for higher tiers. I have found Codex to be faster and more accurate and have a more generous session limit. It may be the way I work, or the tech stack I use, I just did not find Claude to be superior.
0 likes • 21m
@Beau Martin I have a feel there is a lot of personal preference and the models are very close ChatGPT 5.6 Sol Ultra seems to me comparable to Fable in limited testing. I tried using Claude Web for projects and I liked it , however, ChatGPT has so much of my context I just stay with it for now. Another reason to fully embrace ICM 😁. I do a lot of my brainstorming work while driving and haven't had a chance to make myself an ICM app I could talk to while driving.
What do you do when waiting for prompts to come back?
A pad of scrap paper beside the keyboard has done more for my throughput than most of the tooling I changed this year. The minutes a model spends building are the minutes to spend deciding what happens after it lands. - The next sequence - the two or three work orders after this one, written while this one runs. - Notes on the output - what to keep and what to challenge, marked as you read rather than after. - Designs - page layouts, folder trees, flows. Faster to draw than to describe. The dead time in an agentic session is real. A job runs for a few minutes and there are three things you can do with that window: watch it, interrupt it, or think. Watching teaches you nothing and interrupting usually costs a rerun. Writing by hand does something a second chat window does not. The keyboard pulls you back into the work; paper keeps you above it, which is the seat you are supposed to be in while an agent is running. The reading half matters more than the planning half. Marking what to challenge as an output comes in, rather than reaching the end and reconstructing it, is the difference between a next instruction that corrects course and one that just says carry on. The bit I have not solved is getting any of it back into the system. Everything on that pad is orientation the workspace never sees. One of the synced writing tablets pointed at a folder would close that - handwriting arriving as context on the next prompt, and the notes logged as part of the record of how a build actually went. If anyone here has wired one up, I want to hear how. Genuinely think that is one of the more interesting unbuilt pieces sitting in plain sight...
0 likes • 2h
@Alex Brown Pushups
Claude down? 🥱 Who cares!
This is a big win for me. In the past, when Claude was down, it’d be frustraing because it usually happened in the middle of a project, and I’d feel stuck. This time, it happened to be the project that I am testing the ICM folders on. The ICM structure let me hop into Codex and it immediated picked up where things were cut off with a simple one sentence “tell me where we’re at” prompt. Codex was 95% on point with where we were in the task and next steps. The hiccups were due to confusing or missing pointers in the routing. Easy fixes. Still amazed that a “simple” folder restructure can do this. Feels so liberating. Thank you @Jake Van Clief
Claude down? 🥱 Who cares!
0 likes • 5h
This got me today too. I use Claude mostly for my LinkedIn posts. I needed to schedule posts for this week and Claude is down, again. I use Claude infrequently and about half the time I do it is down or very slow. I have not moved my LinkedIn process from a Claude project to ICM. On the ToDo list so I could not hop onto Codex. Well, it may be time to do so 😁
0 likes • 2h
@Gina Wang Looks like everybody jumped on ChatGPT/Codex as well. It is unusually slow right now.
Build a network, not and audience
Something that I have been thinking for a while. I follow Rob Walling, the GOAT, when it comes to bootstrapped SaaS businesses. Founder of Drip and a podcaster for over 16 years. Despite building an enormous, for his niche, audience, he keeps on saying "Build a Network not an Audience." This is obviously advice specific to SaaS founders. My goal: build an ICM to build a network. The easy part is the ICM. The hard part: the process. How do I actually build a network?
1 like • 3h
@Theoo Nis combination of customers, partners, founders, business owners. It looks to me when building an audience, the audience may become too uniform in member composition. For example a lot of tech founders build in public. They build an audience of other tech founders. Then they launch the products and... crickets.
1 like • 3h
@Theoo Nis I believe the business is not as important with a network vs an audience. A network can survive when a business changes, or a new one starts in a new niche. An audience cannot do that.
1 like • 4h
Almost there 😁
1 like • 4h
@Junmarvi Tampac That would be against Skool Policy, but Jake did say help each other out!
1-10 of 99
Leonard Dauksza
5
81 points to level up
@leonard-dauksza-9657
Founder and software engineer building RoosterBot, exploring workflow systems, AI context management, Elixir, and scalable SaaS.

Active 1m ago
Joined May 14, 2026
Seattle, WA
Powered by