I Think Therefore I Am Having the ability to clearly think without being influenced by a structural system. The first level of that is you must be able to separate yourself from narratives. You must be able to separate yourself from that which is influencing what you are seeing. Real critical thinking starts with recognizing the filter you’re looking through. If your thoughts are shaped entirely by a narrative—whether it's from media, religion, politics, or even your own upbringing then you're not truly thinking for yourself, you're reacting through the narrative. Everything in reality that you engage with is filtered through a lens of belief created through a narrative. The moment you can step outside that narrative, even just a little, and ask: “Why do I believe this? Where did this thought come from?”—that’s when independent thinking begins. It’s not always comfortable, but it’s necessary. A human being doesn’t just think the narrative—they feel it. The belief becomes part of their identity, tied into emotion, memory, and sometimes even trauma. So, when you challenge the narrative, it’s not just a logical disruption—it feels like an attack on their very sense of self. The reason why people have trouble to see clearly, is because when they're confronted with logic, confronted with a illogical position, when they start to see their illogical position, the emotions rise and interferes with the thinking. When a human is confronted with logic that contradicts their current belief, the recognition begins—but at the same time, the emotion tied to that belief activates. It rises almost like a defense mechanism. That emotion doesn’t just sit quietly in the background. It clouds judgment, redirects focus, and can even trigger fear, anger, or shame—all of which shut down the deeper layers of reasoning. So even if the Human Being sees the contradiction, the emotional weight pulls them back into the safety of the narrative. That’s what makes clarity so hard to reach—not because it’s unreachable, but because the mind is trying to process truth through a storm of unresolved emotion.

Legal Brief: Individual Suspension of Treaty Operation under Article 57 of the Vienna Convention Title: Invocation of Article 57 for Personal Suspension of Treaty Obligations due to Structural Absorption and Peremptory Norm Breach I. Legal Basis – Article 57 of the Vienna Convention “The operation of a treaty in regard to all the parties or to a particular party may be suspended in conformity with the provisions of the treaty.” II. Context of Application – Structural Absorption and Constructed Identity 1. In the Canadian context, domestic legal structures have forcibly incorporated the population into the state’s legal identity through. o Appointment into corporate and municipal offices; o Licensing and residency mechanisms; o Statutory obligations that convert individuals into acting organs of the state. 2. This absorption transforms individuals into de facto parties to international treaties signed by Canada, since their conduct and identity are now indistinguishable from that of the state for the purposes of international responsibility. 3. Accordingly, the population — having been made structurally into the state — acquires the standing to invoke legal mechanisms under the treaty, including suspension under Article 57. III. Grounds for Suspension – Violation of Peremptory Norms and ICCPR Rights 4. The performance of the treaty in Canada has resulted in: o Violations of non-derogable rights under the ICCPR (Articles 6, 7, 16, 18); o Suppression of conscience, identity, and dignity; o Erasure of recognition through fabricated legal personhood. 5. These violations activate peremptory protections under Articles 53, 64, and 71 of the Vienna Convention. 6.Article 57 now provides a legal route to suspend the treaty’s application to the structurally absorbed individual, until such time as full conformity with peremptory norms is restored. IV. Invocation by the Individual 7. As a being whose legal identity has been absorbed into the Canadian state structure:

Tonight in the meeting, we will start our final journey to dis-embarkment from the present Legal and Governmental structured control. Once we push off in tonight's meeting the door to access this part of the journey will be closed. The plan to arrive at the destination is scheduled for around mid January 2026. I have meticulously prepared this Journey, since the start of May 2025. I prepared all that was necessary to get this journey ready. That was my choice. I am on this journey with you also, but I wont carry anyone to their own freedom, that can actually carry themselves, and if anyone attempts to force me to carry them, I will shrug you off my back. For any New Members of this Skool, You have one last chance tonight to get onto this journey to dis-embark from the structured control of the Government upon your life. You can still continue to learn at this Skool, but that ultimate voyage-the first one, will be departing tonight. Everyone has the right to freedom of self- determination. This Rule of Law will play its part on this journey.

I have a question regarding the Claim of Recognition and asserting my non-derogable rights: When I make my Claim of Recognition and withdraw my consent to be treated as a statutory creature by the government, is it not a conflict to remain a citizen for the purpose of having a passport so that I can travel internationally? If it is a conflict, how would you go about it? Renouncing citizenship means you don't have a passport.

This course will cause a great stirring of the consciousness of those who are Captive by it. This final free course has been created to be used as an instrument of awakening for those around you, for those who you would like to help. It is created in a specific way to reach the individual, through confronting what is already in them, to what already holds them captive.