@Krisztián Nagy sweeeet! 🔥🔥🔥

@Krisztián Nagy

@Paulo Costa, The Roaster Grateful for you, my friend! Thanks for the feature, I'm looking forward to helping as many people as I can to unlock their financial freedom, you've been a great help and I honor you. 🫱🏼‍🫲🏾😌

@Eric William that could be arranged! 🫱🏼‍🫲🏾😌

@Steve Atencio Alright I’ll give you the real, constructive roast, not to tear it down, but to make it actually work! First off… this is NOT a bad idea. In fact, it’s one of those ideas that seems simple but has real potential, IF, positioned correctly. The core problem you’re solving, I think is solid. Vacant land is harder to sell because people can’t really visualize the outcome. You would be the one bridging that gap, there's real value there! But, to be transparent with you, here’s where it breaks down: 👉 Your offer feels like something that's “nice-to-have,” not a “must-have.” Realtors don’t wake up thinking “I need AI house renderings.” They wake up thinking “I need to sell this lot faster.” So the positioning needs to shift from design service → some sort of deal acceleration tool. 👉 $500 is awkward positioning-wise. It’s not cheap enough to be a no-brainer… and not expensive enough to signal serious ROI. You need to tie pricing to outcome that you deliver by either making it lower friction ($99–$199 “test it on one listing”) or higher ticket with a clear ROI angle (“sell your lot faster / increase perceived value”). 👉 “I don’t see anyone doing this” is not always a green light. More often than not, it means opportunity but, sometimes it means the market hasn’t been convinced yet. In this case, I think it’s leaning more towards the second where you need to clarify the better education + positioning, not just the service. Now, here’s how I’d turn this into something that actually works @Steve Atencio 🫱🏼‍🫲🏾 Instead of just selling designs, you could turn this into: “Lot Listing Conversion System” for Realtors Where the deliverable is: • AI-generated home concepts • Simple floorplans • Marketing-ready visuals • + guidance on how to present it to buyers Now you’re not selling design, you’re selling faster sales and higher perceived value through having better designs that speak to their ideal demographic.

@Steve Atencio YEAH MAN! THINK BIGGER! Hahaha you're on to something here! The fact that you recognized you were thinking too small and immediately opened up to repositioning it is exactly what separates ideas that stay concepts from ones that actually turn into something real. Most people would’ve just defended the original idea, you're actually open to criticism and are implementing in real time, that is impressive. And I think repurposing that other community is a smart move too, because now you’re not starting from zero, you’re just redirecting an already existing infrastructure toward a clearer, more outcome-driven offer. If you approach it like, “Let me prove this works with 3–5 realtors first” instead of trying to perfect everything upfront, you’ll get real feedback, real case studies, and real confidence in the model way faster. I really appreciate you being open to the feedback though, that’s why this kind of conversation actually creates momentum 🔥 If you want to bounce ideas as you start shaping it out, I’m down to jam anytime, my friend 🤝

@Paulo Costa, The Roaster This is a fun one ahah really got me thinking there ahah 👀 If I had to build a community with a hard $1K MRR in 90 days, I wouldn’t go broad, I’d go SUPER pain-point specific with immediate ROI. I’d build a community around something like, “First Deal Fast” for beginner real estate wholesalers (or service-based beginners) Why? Because, the outcome is clear and urgent (people want their first win) + it’s easy to position (“get your first deal/client in 30–60 days”) and itt naturally converts because people are already motivated by money/results. The structure would be simple. With weekly action-based calls (not just theory), daily accountability/check-ins, proven scripts, templates, and real-world execution & small wins celebrated constantly to build momentum. And I think, most importantly, I’d filter for action-takers early (application or onboarding questions), so the culture stays tight from day one. To hit $1K MRR fast, I’d: • Start low-ticket ($25–$50/month) • Focus on case studies and quick wins • Personally engage heavy in the first 50–100 members to build proof fast If I compare that to what I’m doing now, the biggest shift would be: 👉 I’d narrow the promise even more and optimize purely for speed of results, not just value or community experience. Because in a 90-day window, clarity + speed beat complexity + scale. Would you go niche and outcome-driven like this, or would you try to win with a broader concept and brand play? 🔥

@Kai Cerar