Corporate bullshit is a thing - might it sway orthodox economists?
I confess to laughing at some passages in an article about what is seemingly called ‘Corporate Bullshit’, arising from work by Shane Littrell, a cognitive psychologist at Cornell University. See https://www.theguardian.com/business/2026/mar/23/corporate-speak-study For example, is there any meaning in the artificially-generated phrases- “we will actualize a renewed level of cradle-to-grave credentialing” or “we will pressure-test a renewed level of adaptive coherence”? Initially, my reaction was to doubt that such empty linguistic inventiveness could play much real-world role - but then I thought of phrases like ‘rational expectations’ used to mean knowledge of the future, and my doubt diminished. Might this at least partly underlie the mental garbage within orthodox economics? Can you think of other examples that might contain econo-corporate bullshitting? The article concludes - “Anybody can fall for bullshit, and we all, depending on the situation, fall for bullshit when it is kind of packaged up to appeal to our biases.”