Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

AI Experts Club

3.4k members • $47/m

Brendan's AI Launchpad

171 members • $59/month

AI Money Lab

62k members • Free

Search Atlas Insider

1.2k members • Free

Voice AI Accelerator

7.6k members • Free

Brendan's AI Community

23.8k members • Free

The Next Level

2.3k members • Free

The AI Advantage

76.7k members • Free

AI Automation Agency Hub

303k members • Free

6 contributions to The AI Advantage
Your AI is lying to you. It just sounds really good doing it.
I ran an experiment that changed how I use AI forever. I took the SAME prompt and sent it to ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini at the same time. Not to see which one was "best." I wanted to see where they DISAGREED. Here's what blew my mind: → ChatGPT gave me a confident, detailed plan. Sounded great. → Claude flagged two risks that ChatGPT completely ignored. → Gemini agreed with ChatGPT's plan... but used completely different reasoning to get there. So who was right? They all were. And they were all wrong. Each one had blind spots that the others caught. That's when it hit me — asking ONE model is like hiring ONE consultant and hoping they don't have blind spots. They always do. So I started doing this with every important decision. Three models. Compare the disagreements. The answer is always in the friction between them. A few things I've noticed after months of doing this: → When all three agree, you can trust the answer. When they don't, that's where the gold is. → ChatGPT is the most confident. Claude is the most cautious. Gemini is the fastest to spot patterns in large data. None of them will tell you they're wrong. → The biggest risk in AI isn't a wrong answer. It's a wrong answer that SOUNDS right and you have no way to know. Curious — is anyone else cross-checking between models, or am I the only one doing this the hard way?
2 likes • 8h
@AI Advantage Team Thanks for asking! I've been building a platform that lets multiple AI models actually collaborate on a single problem — like a boardroom of consultants instead of just one. Each model brings a different cognitive style, and they debate and challenge each other before giving you a final recommendation. Early testing has been eye-opening — the quality of output when AIs push back on each other is on a completely different level than asking one model alone. Happy to share more if you're curious!
1 like • 7h
@AI Advantage Team The algorithms are designed to create adversarial friction with the AI responses and challenge the assumptions made. It has essentially stopped the groupthink where they all agree and the issues propagate. The initial hallucinations from AI models and even users that are not accurate get caught much quicker and so many perspectives get vetted and aligned while keeping the user central to the process. I am still working out some of the kinks as some newer models bring new challenges. For example, the latest release from Gemini has a tendency to want to take over all roles and replies for all the participants. It has been really fascinating into the psychology of the AI models.
How I solved a 1-month bug in 1 hour (by cheating on ChatGPT)
Stop limiting yourself to one LLM. 🛑 Here's why switching could have saved me a month of frustration. I spent almost a month stuck on a website issue. Went back and forth with ChatGPT and Claude—smart models, but neither could crack it. Then I tried something different: I asked Claude to summarize our entire conversation into a markdown file, dumped it into Gemini, and picked up right where I left off. Gemini solved it in an hour. 🤯 It was like bringing a fresh perspective into a cross-functional team meeting. Sometimes you need the engineer's view, sometimes the designer's. Different LLMs have different strengths—and different blind spots. Here's the thing that hit me: I was treating my AI tools like I had one coworker I kept asking about everything. Would you keep asking your marketing person to solve your database architecture problem? Probably not. So why do we default to one LLM for everything? Now I'm rethinking my whole approach: - ChatGPT for creative brainstorming 🎨 - Claude for systems thinking and structured docs 📝 - Gemini for technical problem-solving when I'm stuck 🛠️ - The cross-platform handoff? Dead simple. Export conversation summary → import to new LLM → keep moving. 👇 Question for the group: Are you stuck in a single-LLM relationship? What's your strategy for knowing when to switch models? I'm curious if anyone else has had breakthrough moments by bouncing between LLMs. Drop your experience below.
1 like • Jan 29
@Hussain Ali it's pretty interesting that given a particular problem how a different set of LLMs can be so powerful. I am working on something now where ChatGPT struggled to help but a Claude+Gemini approach is powering through.
Custom GPTs Because Sometimes You Just Need an AI With Attitude
So… I may have gone a little overboard with Custom GPTs lately. I’ve got one that helps me with automation strategy, one that keeps my business organized, and another that politely reminds me to go outside before I turn into a chatbot myself. But here’s the crazy part — you can build a GPT for almost anything: 🐶 A dog behavior expert (I use this one for a new puppy) 🧠 A biotech validation assistant (I use this one for my day job) 💬 A sales closer who never gets tired (I use this one to help with leads) ☕ Or even a motivational coach who yells at you (nicely) until you hit “publish.” (who doesn't need some motivation?!) You don’t need to be a coder — just tell ChatGPT what you want it to know and how you want it to act. You can even ask it to turn your ranting into an effective prompt for creating the Custom GPT! It’s like hiring an expert, giving them your playbook, and not having to pay them vacation days. I’m genuinely blown away by how practical this is becoming for small businesses and creators — you can now design your own digital team with personalities that match your brand. 👉 So now I have to ask… If you could make a Custom GPT today, what would it be — and what kind of “personality” would you give it?
0 likes • Nov '25
@Steven Gentry It's amazing how much more interesting you can make the personalities.
0 likes • Nov '25
@AI Advantage Team Absolutely! I have already picked up a lot from this community!
Where is everyone from? That’s a wrap - what was your biggest takeaway?
Hello new friends! Would love to know where you are from!! 🤗 Houston Texas here. Biggest takeaway for me: It’s not AI that will replace my work, it will be those who learn the tools. 🤯
2 likes • Oct '25
Gainesville, FL USA
1 like • Oct '25
@Ken Stanton I just went live last week with my AI Agency Still working thru some automation builds for my first client and working on a big concept for my day job.
What's your Go To AI Tool?
Curious as to what is your Go To AI tool you use the most? I'm relatively new to the AI space so I only use the paid version of ChatGPT. Would love to hear from others what other AI tools they use to help with their business! Thank you!
3 likes • Oct '25
If you really want to explore some AI tools, create a thorough prompt for ChatGPT (or even a Custom GPT) that includes what you are looking for and how you will be using it. Make sure to include any other parameters (i.e., price, integration with other tools, easy for beginners, tutorials available, etc). ChatGPT will create a targeted recommendation list of tools for you. Then just find a good YouTube video on it to see if it's something you would be interested in.
1-6 of 6
Shawn Miller
3
27points to level up
@shawn-miller-6983
AI agency founder | Helping others automate the repetitive and amplify the important with purpose, creativity, and a little AI magic. ✨

Active 1h ago
Joined Oct 20, 2025
FL USA
Powered by