I always get a fair few folks saying the classic "if only I had more money" line. And I thought I would share a little insight into why this is often the poorest excuse not to do something. The Wright brothers are probably one of the best examples of this. They weren't the obvious pick to figure out human flight. They weren't funded by the government. They weren't backed by some huge institution. They didn't have unlimited time, money, resources or fancy credentials. They had a bicycle shop! Meanwhile, Samuel Langley had the backing of the Smithsonian, a $50K government grant and every logical advantage you could imagine. He was the "smart money" bet. But the Wright brothers had something better. Constraints. Because they didn't have unlimited resources, they had to think differently. They had to test smaller. Move faster. Stay lean. Get creative. They couldn't just throw money at the problem and pretend that was progress. And that's the part most people miss... Sometimes having more resources just gives you more room to be lazy. Which is why the Wright Bothers Won with way less than the competition. I've also experienced many clients who came to me and took a leap to work together who were very financially constrained. Limited resources and they have to make it work. Here's the story of one of them. But most importantly, the lesson is to use your lack of resources as your creative nimble advantage instead of seeing it as a weakness. That doesn't mean buying a course or coaching program if you know you can do it by yourself with 100% certainty. It means using what you have to create exponential results.