I’ve been developing a short educational series that I’ll be releasing over the next few days. As part of that, certain portions will be reserved for PMA members to allow for more focused and contextual discussion. Access to that lesson is currently provided on a case-by-case basis for those who want to engage more deeply. The corresponding material will be available within the lesson “Appeal to Authority.”

There’s something powerful about when faith becomes self-driven rather than instructed. That shift is something I’m grateful to witness.

This is a record of my RTKL process involving East Whiteland Police Department. It is public and is for educational value. View the post on Substack.

I look forward to reviewing the response. RE: Miller v. Octorara Area School District OOR Dkt. AP 2026-0167 Dear Dr. Audrey Flojo-Colletti and Michael Lewis, Esq.: To further develop the record in the above-captioned appeal, by the end of the day (11:59:59 p.m.) on March 26, 2026, the OOR is directing the District to submit the following: 1. Copies of the 5,616 pages of disclosed records and the 26 transmittal emails sent to the Requester; 2. A supplemental privilege log and attestation made pursuant to 18 Pa.C.S. 4904(b), by an individual with actual knowledge, which supports the withholding of and/or the redactions made to all of the responsive records that were not specifically addressed in the District’s February 6, 2026 submission. The aforementioned log should identify each responsive record by Bates No. and list the record type, date, number of pages, authors/recipients and their status/position with the District, whether the record was withheld or redacted and the legal basis for such withholding/redaction. The log should also include a general description of the subject matter of each withheld or redacted record. Not my words,

For transparency, not response I’m sharing two letters I previously sent to the Superintendent and Board of Directors. These are not shared to solicit engagement, debate, or action. No response is expected or required. They are offered simply as part of my own record-keeping and commitment to communicate clearly, respectfully, and in good faith. Read or don’t—either is fine. — Ryan Letter Sent 1/29/2026 to the Superintendent: Superintendent Dr. Colletti, I am writing with care and deliberation. Throughout the past several years, in matters involving law enforcement, school governance, counsel, courts, and administrative agencies, I have sought to conduct myself consistently — with restraint, clarity, and respect for process — even when doing so carried significant personal cost. I have not always succeeded perfectly, but my intent has remained steady: to pursue truth without malice and resolution without unnecessary harm. I understand that Superintendent Dutkiewicz does not maintain a public-facing email address, and I am therefore directing this correspondence through your office consistent with prior communications. As my remaining Right-to-Know requests approach their natural conclusion, I believe it is appropriate to request a meeting to discuss clarification of outstanding issues and to determine whether there is a reasonable path toward resolution before additional institutional or administrative burdens accumulate. I want to acknowledge directly that I understand how difficult it can be for institutions to address matters once they have taken on complexity, risk, and reputational weight. I do not approach this lightly, nor with a desire to impose pressure or extract outcomes. At the same time, the impact of what occurred was real — not only to me and my family, but also to others who objected, spoke, or were affected despite seeking no conflict themselves. Those costs cannot be reduced to abstractions. One practical consideration affecting timing is the need for clear confirmation that I may be present on District property for such a meeting without risk of detention or enforcement action. As you are aware, prior restrictions and related ambiguity have required me to proceed cautiously. Once that issue is resolved and I have confirmation of access, I would be prepared to meet in person.