A Foundational Document (Private Access) I’ve published a long-form written work that examines a pattern I’ve observed across many domains — not just government or public institutions, but also corporate, religious, academic, and relational systems. The pattern is what I describe as asymmetrical judgment: when authority is exercised downward without submitting itself to the same standard. This is not a grievance, exposé, or call to action. It is a structured examination of how process quietly replaces moral accountability, and why certain people — particularly those oriented toward coherence rather than performance — often feel out of place within such systems. Because this material is easily misunderstood when skimmed or shared out of context, the full document is hosted privately and password-protected. Nothing in it demands agreement, response, or alignment. It exists as a reference point for those who want to think carefully and lawfully, without pressure.If you’re interested, access information is provided privately. If not, no engagement is expected. Active PMA Members will receive a DM with a secure link and a password. This information is PMA Only and protected by © Meraki 2025-2026 All Rights Reserved. For more of my "private" thoughts to assist my friends, I've added some spiritually related material <Here

Just wanted you guys to know that I got an RTK reply with some interesting data. I reviewed the information and still am engaging with the RTK Officer as additional information is being requested. Members will have access.

This is education on how to lawfully stand on the necessary self advocacy for individuals with qualified disabilities when engaging public officials.

I’ve added a new confidential PMA-only lesson that documents recent events and platform enforcement outcome. To preserve privacy, stewardship, and proper context: • The substantive content is not public • Access is limited to verified PMA members • Materials are shared under restricted license inside the PMA Access details (link + password) will be sent via PMA direct message when requested. If you believe you should have access and do not receive a message, please reach out privately. Thank you for honoring the boundaries that protect everyone involved.

Over the past year, I’ve assembled a formal record related to disability access, due process, and the preservation of testimony. Portions of that record were submitted under seal. I’ve now prepared a public, redacted version of the record. A few important clarifications for this community: - This document is not an accusation - It is not legal advice - It does not name individuals - It exists to preserve continuity and conscience — not to persuade or inflame - I am being intentional about how access is handled. This is not a mass-download resource. The record is shared individually, with the expectation of good-faith stewardship. If you want to understand what the record is and is not, I’ve written a short explanation here:👉 [What the record is and is not] If, after reading that page, you wish to request access to the redacted record, you’re welcome to reach out privately. Thank you for approaching this with discernment and care.