I watched Drake's FOMO film, and I'm probably about to make myself the villain with this one. 😂 As a Gen Xer who grew up with hip-hop, I've always viewed hip-hop as more than a genre of music. It's a culture. It came from struggle. Reinvention. Making something out of nothing. And even as artists became successful, there was something powerful about remaining connected to the culture that created them. Watching FOMO, I found myself wondering whether Drake has crossed into something different. And I'm not saying an artist can't evolve. They absolutely should. I'm also not saying a rapper can't make country, R&B, pop, dancehall, house, or whatever else inspires them. Hip-hop itself has always borrowed, sampled, mixed, and reinvented. But there has to be a point where being influenced by other cultures and genres becomes something else entirely. Drake has reached a level of wealth and creative freedom where he can essentially make whatever he wants—and FOMO feels like exactly that. Hip-hop, R&B, country influences, goth aesthetics, luxury, pop culture...everything thrown into one world. And maybe that's the point. But it left me asking something bigger: At what point does an artist stop being a hip-hop artist who experiments with other genres and simply become a pop artist who also makes hip-hop? And here's the part that's probably going to get me in trouble: Should we even care? Part of me thinks we should. Because if hip-hop is a culture and not simply a musical genre, then I think there's value in preserving what makes that culture distinct—especially as it becomes increasingly global, commercialized, and blended into everything else. Maybe Drake represents hip-hop becoming bigger than its original boundaries. Or maybe he represents what happens when an artist becomes so big that the culture he came from is no longer big enough to contain him. So I'll leave y'all with two questions: Where's the line between evolution and losing connection to the culture? And maybe the bigger question...