Just had my scan result and I’ve managed to shrink my largest met by 5mm from 65mm, a lung met also had a bit shaved off and my pancreas met looks thinner but the same length! What did I do? Well I added in fbz to the protocol 3-4 months before the scan and I added iscador Qu by subcutaneous injections for 4 weeks before the scan. A previous IV mistletoe therapy for an 5 week period gave me stability in the next scan. Mistletoe is an immune system mobiliser If you can do that and have some sauna’s/fevers I think you might get things working better. I’m carrying on with another course of iscador qu and will try and keep it going for 3 months. My oncologist went ape about it but I think it’s having an effect.

To every one of you walking this path — whether you’re fighting, supporting someone you love, researching late at night, or simply trying to hold things together — I want you to know how deeply respected you are. This journey is not easy. It takes courage, resilience, curiosity, and heart. And yet, despite everything, this community continues to show up with generosity, wisdom, and care for one another. That matters more than words can express. Christmas can bring joy, but it can also bring reflection, uncertainty, and mixed emotions — and all of that is okay. Wherever you find yourself today, please know you’re not alone. Wishing you peace, moments of warmth, and renewed hope as we move toward a new year together 💚

I have stable scan results from last months scan. The bastards make me wait for a month to get the results! It’s a PITA as it’s a month of mental torture and how can I adjust my protocol based on a month ago? I did add in Mistleto therapy (Helixior A) by IV and I have been using fenben with ivm instead of mebendazole. I should learn to do one thing at a time! The previous 2 scans had mixed results but the biggest mets grew slightly so halting that is a huge relief!

Today marks a huge step for our mission — the first episode of the Cancer Warriors Podcast is officially live on YouTube! This series shares real stories of hope and science, exploring how people are using metabolic therapy and repurposed drugs in their healing journeys. The goal is simple: to give a voice to those on the frontlines — patients, caregivers, and scientists — and to keep spreading the message about metabolic therapy. Please like, comment, and share if this episode resonates with you — it helps the algorithm reach more Warriors who need hope and this information. https://youtu.be/lVoFRSvPD_Q?si=1ZxFqPdQ6MW4jhFP

Hey Warriors, I wanted to share an honest update about my mum’s latest scan and what I’ve learned through this process — I hope it helps others make more informed decisions. Unfortunately, my mum’s recent PET scan results weren’t good. For context, the previous scan in June showed a mixed response with one new lesion appearing. Because of financial constraints, we stopped IV Vitamin C and HBOT about four months ago, and I had planned to strengthen her protocol with additional off-label therapies — Low Dose Naltrexone (LDN), Doxycycline, Hydroxychloroquine, and Niclosamide — all discussed in Jane McLelland’s book How to Starve Cancer. My mum completed the 3-month Orthomolecular protocol back in June and that’s when we saw positive but mixed results. At the time, my mum had strong faith in the NHS oncologists and their plan with immunotherapy (Keytruda). They weren’t sure if the June scan reflected pseudoprogression or inflammation, and even though the radiologist advised a CT scan for clarification, the oncologists decided to wait until the next PET scan. Sadly, that delay cost us valuable time. The latest scan now shows more lesions, and we were told now that SRS/Gamma Knife is no longer an option. The oncologist’s words were: “It’s too late for that.” Also CA125 jumped from 395 to 1100 in 3/4 months. The NHS is an incredible resource in many ways, especially because it funds chemotherapy and immunotherapy, but most NHS doctors have little or no understanding of metabolic therapy. They tend to dismiss it or even speak negatively about it. I printed out research papers and handed them directly to the team, but they ignored them completely. My mum followed their advice because she trusted them, which is understandable, but this experience has changed her perspective. Now she wants to move forward under integrative expert guidance, possibly through Astron Health or a similar precision-medicine approach. From Jane McLelland’s book, I learned that adenocarcinomas (like my mum’s) are generally glutamine-driven, meaning they rely heavily on glutamine as a primary fuel source. We target glutamine in several ways — through fasting and exercise simultaneously, which deplete available fuel, and more importantly through the use of specific off-label drugs. One of the most powerful glutamine antagonists is DON (6-diazo-5-oxo-L-norleucine), though it’s out of reach for most of us due to limited access and high cost. That’s why it’s crucial to investigate or implement other off-labels that can impact glutamine metabolism indirectly. This is also where diet becomes strategic: a pescatarian approach, as Jane suggests, or a vegan keto diet during the kill phase makes a lot of sense for targeting both glutamine and methionine metabolism simultaneously.