I am an entrepreneur and a tech professional. Been working with software systems for quite a while, and one pattern comes up a lot. The first version works fine. Then customers grow, operations get bigger, and little technical problems start showing up everywhere. Too many manual steps. APIs that don’t talk properly. Slow backend. Data sitting in different places. AI added, but not really connected to the actual workflow. Usually not one huge problem. More like five small ones quietly costing time every day. For those running a company now, what’s becoming harder on the technical side as you grow?

Hey everyone - glad to have you here! Whether you joined for the classes, the community, or both, this will be the most valuable investment you've made if you actually use it. Most people join things like this and never do anything with them. Don't be that person. I created this community to help you grow in your business, career, your personal life, and connect with like-minded people who are actually doing the work. It's about you and I hope you enjoy everything my team and I have put into it. First thing - book your onboarding call with me: BOOK FREE ONBOARDING CALL This is a one-time call where we'll go over what you're trying to build and give you a custom roadmap. Most people skip this and wonder why they're not getting results. Don't skip it. New here and on the free plan? You still get access to the first 4 modules of every mastery course — check the "Free Preview" versions in the Classroom. Second thing - introduce yourself below: - What's your name? - Where are you based? - What made you join and what are you trying to build? I want to see where everyone's coming from and what you're working on. The courses cover AI video mastery, automation, sales frameworks, prompt engineering, GHL, and more. The AI space is evolving fast and I'm adding new stuff constantly so you have the most current training. Before you touch any course, watch the mindset videos. I know it sounds like something you'd skip. Don't. People who actually build stuff and get results watch these first. People who just collect courses and never execute skip them. The community part matters more than you think. Ask questions. Answer questions. Share what you're building. The people who engage here get way more out of it than the ones who lurk. That's just how it works. If you're looking to hire, get hired, or partner with someone, check the Partnerships section. Weekly Live Class (Code Brew): Every Thursday 8am - 9am PST. Bring your questions and anything you're stuck on. We go through it together live.

Everyone who has tried to build a real agent knows the problem, and it isn't intelligence. Getting a model to plan a task is easy. Keeping it alive three hours into an unsupervised job is where homemade setups die. The context window fills up. A tool call fails and nothing recovers. It loses track of what it was doing halfway through. You end up writing more plumbing than product. Last Wednesday OpenAI opened the Agents API in public beta. It's the same harness that runs Codex and ChatGPT for Work, and it handles exactly that layer. Session orchestration. Context compaction when the window fills. Subagent coordination. Crash recovery. Durable sessions that pick up where they left off. Agents that stay running for days. There's no fee for the API itself. You pay for tokens, tools, and sandbox compute, which you were paying for anyway. The numbers from launch customers are worth a look. 📊 One company moved their case review workflow onto it and cut cost per case by 60%. Another decoupled their agent from the sandbox environment and dropped failed responses by 86%. A third reported their evaluation score climbing from 0.71 to 0.85, and specifically credited being able to see and orchestrate subagents instead of guessing at what they were doing. Different companies, different workloads, all vendor-reported. But the pattern is consistent and it's not about the model getting smarter. It's the scaffolding underneath getting solid. You can also run the sandbox wherever you want. OpenAI-hosted, your own infrastructure, or partners like Cloudflare and Vercel. And it speaks MCP, so tools you've already wired up plug in. Here's the part worth thinking about even if you never touch an API. 💡 The build-versus-buy line just moved, and it moved against a lot of people's business models. If you've been paying a developer to build orchestration, retry logic, session memory, and error recovery for your agents, a big chunk of that work is now free infrastructure maintained by someone else. That's not a small line item. For most agent projects it's the majority of the engineering.

GPT-Live-1 went live in the API last Thursday. If you build anything that talks to people, this changes the architecture you've been using. Here's the old way. Speech comes in, gets converted to text. Text goes to a language model. Model writes a reply. Reply gets converted back to speech. Three systems, chained, each one waiting for the last. That chain is why AI phone agents sound like AI phone agents. The pause before it answers. Talking over you when you interrupt. Going dead silent for six seconds while it looks something up. GPT-Live-1 replaces the whole chain with one model that listens and speaks at the same time. It can hear you cut in while it's mid-sentence and actually stop. It handles your "mhm" without treating it as a turn. It deals with background noise and someone changing direction halfway through a request. But the part that actually matters is the split. 🧠 The voice model only runs the conversation. The thinking gets handed off to a different model you pick, and the conversation keeps flowing while that work happens in the background. I wrote about GPT-6 Astra a few days ago and said flat out don't put it anywhere near a live call, because time to first token is over fourteen seconds. This is the answer to that. Astra can sit behind the voice layer and think for as long as it needs while the caller hears a natural conversation instead of silence. That's not a better voice. That's a different shape of system. One launch customer replaced their old voice pipeline with this and deleted roughly 23,000 lines of code. About 80% of that codebase, gone. Another says interruptions dropped by nearly 80% against their old turn-based setup. Now the thing everyone's going to get wrong. 💸 The headline is 5 cents a minute, billed by the second. That's the voice layer only. You also pay for the backend model doing the reasoning, the tools it calls, and your telephony on top. So if you're building on this and you quoted a client based on 5 cents, go redo your math today. I price a voice product per minute for a living and this is exactly the kind of line item that quietly eats a margin.

DeepSeek shipped V4.1 Flash last Thursday. As of today, if you call their flagship V4 Pro endpoint, your request quietly gets routed to the cheaper Flash model instead. At Flash prices. Read that again. A company just deprecated its premium tier because its budget tier scores higher on its own benchmarks. That doesn't usually happen. Here's the pricing, and it's the whole story. Off-peak it's 15 cents per million input tokens and 60 cents per million output. GPT-6 Astra and Claude Fable 5.1 both charge $10 and $50. So roughly 30 times cheaper on the way in and 40 times cheaper on the way out. But the number to actually pay attention to is the cache hit rate. Three tenths of a cent per million tokens. $0.003. 💸 That sounds like a rounding error until you think about what an agent actually does. Every single turn it re-reads the same system prompt, the same tool definitions, the same conversation history, the same codebase. DeepSeek says outright that repeated reads are where a large share of agent cost comes from. They built the architecture around making that part nearly free. On their own tests it scored 74.2 on the main coding benchmark against Claude Opus 5's 74.0 and GPT-5.6 Sol's 73.0. One design company that tested it said it hit 98% of GPT-6 Astra's quality on their everyday requests at 1.4% of the cost. Three practical things if you build with this stuff. 🔧 It speaks Anthropic's API format. So if you already have code written against Claude, pointing it at DeepSeek is closer to a config change than a rewrite. That makes testing it this week nearly free in your time too. Watch the clock. Peak pricing is double, and peak is defined in UTC. If you're in the US, almost your entire workday lands in the cheap window. If you're running scheduled or batch jobs, you can move them there deliberately and halve the bill on purpose. The weights are MIT licensed and on Hugging Face. That means commercial use, self-hosting, and nothing leaving your network. Same door opener as Kimi for any client who's been saying no to AI on compliance grounds.