Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

Anelia Sutton

195 members • Free

2 contributions to Anelia Sutton
🔎 Detrimental Reliance: What It Means & How to Use It Against Corrupt Judges
Detrimental reliance happens when you rely on someone in authority to act fairly and follow the rules — and you get harmed because they didn’t. In law, it means: 👉 You reasonably believed the judge (or authority) would behave according to law, fairness, and due process… 👉 You relied on that belief during your case… 👉 And because the judge violated those standards, you suffered harm, loss, or prejudice. It is rooted in equity — meaning the court must act honorably if it expects YOU to honor its rulings. 🧠 Why It Matters in Judicial Misconduct Cases Most people walk into court believing: - The judge will be neutral - The judge will follow procedure - The judge will listen to evidence - The judge will not insult, bully, or shame them That expectation is reasonable. Judges swear an oath to do exactly that. So when a judge behaves like a wayward, rude, biased, or hostile authority figure, you can argue: “I relied on the court’s duty of fairness and that reliance led to harm because the judge abandoned neutrality.” This is detrimental reliance. ⚖️ How to Use Detrimental Reliance in Your Case...You can raise detrimental reliance in: 1. Judicial Misconduct Complaints Point out that you relied on the judge’s oath and legal duty to conduct themselves with fairness and impartiality — and that the misconduct caused: - Loss of rights - Skewed rulings - Financial harm - Reputation damage - Emotional/psychological injury - Procedural injustice 2. Motions to Vacate or Reconsider Show that the entire ruling is tainted because you relied on a “fair tribunal” that didn’t exist. A biased judge = constitutional defect. 3. Appeals Appeals LOVE this argument.Judges cannot violate your reliance on fundamental fairness. If they do, the ruling is often reversible error. 4. Civil Rights Lawsuits (42 USC § 1983) If the misconduct rises to a constitutional violation, detrimental reliance strengthens your argument that: - You expected due process - You were denied due process - You suffered actual harm because of that denial
4 likes • Nov 19
Awesome topic and read. Its truly powerful
💥 WELCOME - START HERE
Welcome to the Community on Skool.com. I’m so glad you’re here. This isn’t just another group. It’s the beginning of your legal journey. I am Dr. Anelia Sutton. I was betrayed, broken, and underestimated by the court system. But I rose from the ashes of injustice to rewrite the future. Now, I’m here to share what I’ve learned so you can stand tall, crush corruption, and win with confidence. 👋 DIVE INTO THE TABS - Community: create a new post to share info, not just ask questions - Classroom: free classes and even schedule one-on-one strategy sessions with me - Calendar: our schedule of live events 👋 DO’s and DONT’s - Do NOT ask any questions on this post - Do NOT send private messages to me - Do NOT DM me or tag me - Do NOT seek support for MPU courses here - Do NOT hijack someone’s post or comment with your own issue - Do share legal research, not just ask questions - Do say hello on this post - Do ‘like’ this post and all posts as a thank you - Do say how you found this community - Do enroll in the free classes (Classroom tab) - Do post then pack your patience - Do review this post often for updates 👋 FYI - There’s a post dedicated to Family Court, Child Support and Traffic Court - Most questions have answers in the Classroom Together, we’re building more than a community, we’re rising as everyday heroes who crush corruption and stand tall with confidence. I’m so glad you’re here. Let’s rise together. With strength, Anelia
💥  WELCOME - START HERE
5 likes • Sep 3
Peace and Love. Thanks for inviting me. I'm thrilled to be in the family.
1-2 of 2
Newton Bey
2
11points to level up
@newton-bey-3579
Student For Life

Active 29d ago
Joined Sep 2, 2025
Powered by