Family, I want to be clear, transparent, and respectful of everyone’s time—especially mine. This Skool group will be closing. Not because the mission is over—but because the platform no longer serves the purpose of a real community. From the beginning, this group was designed to be participatory, not performative. The rules were clear: This space was meant for everyone to post, share, question, contribute, and grow together—across different walks of life and levels of experience. What I’ve seen instead is a dynamic where most members wait for me to post, consume, and move on. That is not a community. That is an audience. I do not build audiences.I build movements. And I will not continue paying $99 per month to host a free space where participation is one-sided. What’s next: - This free community and all of my posts will be moving to Substack, where I can share openly without unnecessary platform costs. - Substack allows me to continue delivering value without subsidizing disengagement. - Those who genuinely want to stay connected will follow. This is not a punishment. This is a boundary. Leadership requires discernment, and I’m choosing alignment over convenience. Thank you to those who did participate, speak up, and engage in good faith. I’ll see you on Substack. — Doc

Peaceful Gladiators, Please click the link to read the article. https://www.einpresswire.com/article/866389473/dr-anelia-sutton-calls-on-community-political-and-faith-leaders-to-recognize-law-education-as-a-human-right Then vote Yes or No: Should law education be a human rights issue? Remember to hit the like button for your community engagement points! 🤗

Family…When you step into a legal battle, you must Go to War.But hear me clearly: Go to war. Be calm. NOT soft. The recipe is always the same — no matter what response you get from corrupt court officials. Corrupt people do corrupt things. Liars lie. So don’t be shocked when they act like exactly what they are. Their entire strategy is to shake you… to drain you… to make you so depleted that you give up. Don’t give them that satisfaction. Stick to the plan. Go to war. Be calm. NOT soft. When I work with a client, all I do is write down everything they tell me. That’s it. They hire me to do the same thing they could’ve done for themselves. I’m honored to help — but I’m not needed. Because you know what happened to you better than anyone else on this Earth. The only thing truly missing ISN'T: - being new to law...you can learn it - or not knowing court rules...they’re on the courthouse website The REAL missing ingredient is confidence in yourself. When you put these three together: 1. The Law 2. The Court Rules 3. Confidence in Yourself …you become unstoppable and that’s how you win. The corruption is out of control and the need for tools is great. So I put everything I learned in my 7+ years in the trenches in my book, The Law Revolution. Why? Because it is not humanly possible for me to help everyone one on one. This is WHY I wrote it. It is a blueprint written in plain language so that ANYONE at any level from beginner to advanced legal researchers can master their own journey. Get it and read it 25 times. It is literally what I did when I was a beginner, kneehigh to a grasshopper. There were days when I would spend an entire day reading the same paragraph over and over until it "stuck". No shame in being a beginner. Beginners will always have a special place in my heart because it is where we ALL begin any new journey. Alright, let me close with this... If you receive something from a court. They expect you to give into fear and panic.

Detrimental reliance happens when you rely on someone in authority to act fairly and follow the rules — and you get harmed because they didn’t. In law, it means: 👉 You reasonably believed the judge (or authority) would behave according to law, fairness, and due process… 👉 You relied on that belief during your case… 👉 And because the judge violated those standards, you suffered harm, loss, or prejudice. It is rooted in equity — meaning the court must act honorably if it expects YOU to honor its rulings. 🧠 Why It Matters in Judicial Misconduct Cases Most people walk into court believing: - The judge will be neutral - The judge will follow procedure - The judge will listen to evidence - The judge will not insult, bully, or shame them That expectation is reasonable. Judges swear an oath to do exactly that. So when a judge behaves like a wayward, rude, biased, or hostile authority figure, you can argue: “I relied on the court’s duty of fairness and that reliance led to harm because the judge abandoned neutrality.” This is detrimental reliance. ⚖️ How to Use Detrimental Reliance in Your Case...You can raise detrimental reliance in: 1. Judicial Misconduct Complaints Point out that you relied on the judge’s oath and legal duty to conduct themselves with fairness and impartiality — and that the misconduct caused: - Loss of rights - Skewed rulings - Financial harm - Reputation damage - Emotional/psychological injury - Procedural injustice 2. Motions to Vacate or Reconsider Show that the entire ruling is tainted because you relied on a “fair tribunal” that didn’t exist. A biased judge = constitutional defect. 3. Appeals Appeals LOVE this argument.Judges cannot violate your reliance on fundamental fairness. If they do, the ruling is often reversible error. 4. Civil Rights Lawsuits (42 USC § 1983) If the misconduct rises to a constitutional violation, detrimental reliance strengthens your argument that: - You expected due process - You were denied due process - You suffered actual harm because of that denial

How do I make them recognize my revoking implied consent on driver's license trying to get a dwls 3rd