I just red a study I had to share with you guys. Eight months ago, the best AI agent in the world could only complete 2.5% of real freelance projects to a client-acceptable standard. Today that number is 16.1%. The Remote Labor Index tests AI agents on actual commissioned work (3D/CAD, architecture, video, web dev, and more), with every deliverable judged by human evaluators against a professional's paid output, not a benchmark score. The new leader is Anthropic's Fable 5, roughly double Opus 4.8 (8.3%) and well ahead of GPT-5.5 (6.3%). Here's the part I find reassuring: the researchers also tried replacing human evaluators with an AI judge. It overestimated the newest models' performance by up to 3x. Turns out we can't yet trust an AI to reliably judge another AI's work, human evaluation is still doing the heavy lifting. So no, humans aren't out of the loop yet. But going from 2.5% to 16.1% in under 8 months is the kind of curve that should have people paying attention, regardless of industry. Curious how others here read this: signal of what's coming, or still early enough not to worry? Source: https://safe.ai/blog/significant-increase-in-digital-labor-automation

Huge shoutout to everyone who finished the 7-Day Challenge this month and got certified. Seven days, zero to your own executive assistant in Claude Code. Step by step, from nothing to shipped. These 46 members put in the reps and walked away with a working assistant they built themselves: Larry Crane, Al Mulrooney, Hassan Eid, Brandon Claeys, Marc-Antoine Siewe, Neelima Rani, Javier Yranzo, Elmuntasir Mukhier, Cristian Victoria, Alberto Galdames, Harena Juan Rabarijaona, Greg Faysash, Logan Clegg, Paul Forster, Estefania Tidwell, Vuk Simić, Iain Littlejohn, Mark Moran, Julius Waggoner, Michael Wijaya, Ilias Kirbashev, Leviticus Kinchen, Duy Nguyen, Vina Egg, Žiga Kalan, David Richardson, Lesetša Mutchinya, Abrie van Wijk, Firoz Shaikh, Farel Viaho, Alberto Camacho, Tito Burga, Chad, Peter Lukacsi, Sanjana N, Ayhan Bulut, Jerry, Hamza Sajjad, Tim van Kollenburg, Elias B., Ismoiljon Farhodov, Tim Metzner, Java Hardge, Philippe, Papa, Robin Pinchard If you haven't started yet, the challenge is completely free and it's right here: https://www.skool.com/ai-automation-society/classroom/dda699b7?md=08b046f630344596b864d1cd4304bda0 One lesson, one build, each day. By the end you'll have your own Claude Code assistant up and running. See you in the next cohort. - Nate

I wanted my AI assistant to read my work email and calendar. The obvious path was the Microsoft Graph API or the Microsoft 365 connector. Both need org admin OAuth consent. In a large organization, admin consent is a long road: tickets, approvals, security reviews, and waiting. So I stopped trying to go through the cloud. My Mac already has legitimate, authenticated access to the same data. Outlook syncs my Exchange account into Apple Mail and Apple Calendar. The credentials are mine, already granted, already inside org policy. The trick was reaching that local layer instead of the org-controlled API layer. Two pieces made it work: - Email through Apple Mail. A small AppleScript reads my inbox and writes replies straight to the Drafts folder. It never sends. I review every draft in Mail before anything leaves my machine. - Calendar through EventKit. This one was harder. My AI tool runs inside VS Code, so macOS attributes calendar permission to VS Code, which declares no calendar usage and gets auto-denied with no prompt. The fix was a small signed standalone .app helper. macOS runs it as its own process, it asks for calendar access on its own, and it gets granted independently of VS Code. The result: my assistant preps me for meetings, turns inbox threads into project tasks, and drafts replies in my voice. All local. Nothing sends without my review. No new cloud permissions, no admin consent, no policy exception. The lesson: when the cloud door is locked behind approvals, check the local door. The data you already have rights to is often reachable at the OS layer, with your existing credentials, inside the rules.

All paid plans with usage included can access Fable 5 through July 7. You can use Fable 5 up to 50% of your weekly usage limit, after which you can switch to another model for the remainder of your usage. You can also continue using Fable via usage credits.

Looking to have discovery calls with AI Automation Engineers. Would love to talk through your processes and help you find work if needed. DM me if interested