Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

Agency Coach Community

4.5k members • Free

Agency Blueprint - Ethan Welby

2.9k members • Free

Agency Flywheel Hub

4.7k members • Free

RC Agency Owners & Freelancers

6.5k members • Free

AI Automation Syndicate

957 members • Free

Appointment Setting Clan

6.6k members • Free

Lead Gen Bros (Free)

953 members • Free

4 contributions to Lead Gen Secrets
Yet another 0% inbox rate for microsoft post
I've seen some good advice there from @leonardo-orihuela-8122 and @mkhuzaima-afzal-6901. Still curious to see if anyone else is dealing with this and fixed it. Maybe hear some strategies from @Jay Feldman , @Jordan Wiseman or whoever is used to deal with this? At this point it looks like a global issue right now. My client campaigns were 100% microsoft inbox rate just weeks ago. Now you won't get over 0% inbox rate even for something as simple as "hey will you be on the meeting tomorrow?" one-line type of emails. Not a copy issue. Tested this as well on other mailboxes i haven't used for months, still warming up daily. 0% outlook. 100% google. I'm considering buying Outlook mailboxes soon. Though I'm not sure if it will fix anything? Getting more clarity would be great.
2 likes • 2d
Yes, you are right. It seems like there is a global issue right now. I spoke with a friend who works at a big agency, and he told me their Outlook deliverability is still good. I talked more with him, and he explained something important. A lot of sequencers in the market have been using the same warmup pools for years. So when you start warming up through them, their IPs and warmup networks may already be flagged in Outlook spam filters. Because of that, your emails start going to spam, and even your domain can get affected. This is why Outlook deliverability can drop to almost zero when using these public sequencer warmup pools. Many agencies are now using their own closed Outlook-based warmup pools. They warm domains by sending emails into the Outlook network, and if any emails land in spam, they manually or automatically move them to the primary inbox for around 30 days. Doing this consistently improves deliverability. Sending 20–30 emails daily to Outlook mail servers and getting them placed in the primary inbox helps build trust with Outlook. So the core thing is this: whether you use Outlook accounts or Google accounts, without proper Outlook-based warmup, your emails can still go to spam. Outlook has become very restrictive now, and using sequencer warmup pools can actually hurt your deliverability instead of improving it.
0 likes • 2d
So I am building my own Outlook-based warmup network to improve inbox deliverability. It should be ready within one week. The strategy is to send 6 to 7 warmup emails daily to Outlook servers, get replies and engagement from those emails, and then send only 1 to 2 cold emails per mailbox. This way, your sending pattern looks more natural, and your cold emails have a much better chance of landing in the inbox. This is the same strategy many agencies are using, and I am also implementing it now. Let’s see how it performs.
100% Spam to Microsoft Emails but 100% inbox to Google
Question to you awesome people. I have 6 inboxes from Google on 2 domains that are about 2 months old. After 30 days of warming, they were all fine so I used them for cold email. But after a couple of week, the Microsoft issue started. Anyone had a similar experience? What do you guys think happened and what can I do to resolve it? Thanks!
100% Spam to Microsoft Emails but 100% inbox to Google
0 likes • 3d
@John Rami Where do you get Outlook accounts from?
0 likes • 3d
@John Rami That's the thing, bro. $30 is too expensive. I just use my own Jays InboxInsider setup, which costs me only $15 per domain and gives me basically the same setup. One thing I've noticed is that if you really want better Outlook deliverability, you need an Outlook based warmup system. The warmup mailboxes should send emails only to Outlook mailboxes. If an email lands in Spam, it should automatically mark it as "Not Spam," move it to the Primary inbox, and interact with it. Doing this consistently for around 30 days seems to improve Outlook deliverability a lot. I'm building this for myself right now. Let's see how it performs. 🙂
Anyone consistently landing in Microsoft inboxes?
Has anyone managed to improve deliverability to Microsoft accounts recently? I’ve tried practically everything: Outlook to Outlook Google to Outlook Heavy spintax Low sending volumes I’ve tried everything imaginable. Even so, I’m still seeing results that are significantly worse than those with Google or other ESPs. Have you found a strategy that actually works in 2026 to improve deliverability to Microsoft? Or do you think cold emailing Microsoft accounts has become so restrictive that it’s no longer worth it as a prospecting channel? I’m interested in hearing about your real experiences, tools, configurations, or changes that have made a difference.
0 likes • 3d
I'll show you privately if you want. It's simple. If you follow these steps, your deliverability problems will be solved. I and most agencies are using this exact setup.
1 like • 3d
@Leonardo Orihuela I'm also building an Outlook based warmup tool. It sends warmup emails only between Outlook mailboxes. If an email lands in Spam, it automatically marks it as important, moves it to the Primary inbox, and interacts with it to create positive engagement signals. After running it for around 30 days, it helps improve Outlook deliverability. I'm building it for my own use, but if you're interested in trying it once it's ready, let me know.
Why can't I land in Microsoft?
It's been a week and I'm all in Google for 40 mailboxes. I am the only one having issues? My mailboxes are 4 months old. I know health scores don't mean much. But I'm 100%. Can you help me out to figure what's going on?
Why can't I land in Microsoft?
3 likes • 3d
Also, your email copy and your offer matter a lot. Make sure your email copy contains zero spam trigger words because that's one of the best ways to improve your chances of landing in the inbox. You're using an older style of cold email copy. You can use this framework to write much better emails: https://meadow-leader-47c.notion.site/Hormozi-s-100M-Cold-Email-Equation-34681f7dc52781e2b921e5a7a09323ca
0 likes • 3d
@Haseeb Ahmad Yes, sure. This is my WA: +92 334 6898400
1-4 of 4
M.khuzaima Afzal
2
9points to level up
@mkhuzaima-afzal-6901
Full-stack builder | Love automation, web apps & scaling ideas | Here to network and level up

Active 9h ago
Joined Jun 28, 2026
Powered by