Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

Further Learning In PFP

93 members • Free

Next Level Web Design - Framer

364 members • Free

From Zero to AI HERO 🦸

216 members • $20/m

6 contributions to Further Learning In PFP
Is this issue as straight forward as it looks?
Why? How would you deal with it? Include manufacturers standard detail if you have time.
Is this issue as straight forward as it looks?
3 likes • 16d
From a photo like this it is not possible to conclude whether the issue is straightforward or not. There is insufficient information to identify a compliant firestopping solution. It is not even clear whether this penetration is through a wall or a ceiling, which is critical when selecting the correct tested detail. The following details are missing: wall or ceiling construction type, required fire resistance rating, number of plasterboard layers and thickness, stud type and cavity configuration, cable type and diameter, annular gap size, whether sealing is required from one side or both sides, and whether the penetration sits within a tested compartment line. The blue plasterboard alone does not indicate the fire performance of the construction and cannot be used to select a firestopping system. Before proposing any solution, the construction specification and required EI rating must be confirmed. Only after that can a tested manufacturer detail be selected and applied correctly. Without this information, any recommendation would be speculative and not compliant with tested firestop systems or manufacturer installation guidance. Firestopping must always follow a verified tested detail, not a visual assumption based on a site photograph.
TOOLS?
Please take the time to engage with this post. Engagement is how we grow the community and learn from and support each other👇 We’re getting close to the official launch on 5th April, and I want to get a bit more interaction going in the group. So—where are you lot buying your tools from at the minute? - Screwfix? - Toolstation? - Direct from suppliers? And what brands are you actually using on site? Anything you swear by… or anything you’d avoid? No right or wrong answers—just interested in what people are actually using day to day. Also being honest, this is another bit of a test for engagement ahead of launch. I’ve got something lined up for you all on the 5th, and this will help shape it. Let’s hear it 👇
2 likes • 19d
@Steve Platt There is no such thing as the most expensive tool if you have the right job for it. The most expensive one I bought was a Graco Ultra Max 2; the price was over £2,000 back in 2017.
1 like • 19d
@Dimitar Gvozdeykov Over the last few years, I have gradually stepped back from this type of work because of the pay level. I have moved my focus away from tool-based roles, especially as the physical strain builds up over time and makes it less practical for me to continue.
QOTW #4
Which document provides legally relied-upon evidence of a passive fire protection product’s declared fire performance?
Poll
5 members have voted
1 like • 26d
@Steve Platt Thank you for the information.
Question of the week #1
And in the beginning there was…. As an individual installer, what specific evidence must you provide to demonstrate your personal competency for the installation of passive fire protection systems on a UK construction site?
Poll
4 members have voted
1 like • Feb 22
Having a lot of documents and speaking confidently using technical terms, in my personal experience, does not automatically make someone a good installer or a strong leader. There are many installers, supervisors and managers who have paperwork, but no real knowledge or practical understanding of Passive Fire Protection. Our work relies heavily on personal responsibility and a clear understanding of why it is critical to follow the standards and the tested details. Proper training should happen on site, in real conditions, not just through a one-hour session with an NVQ assessor to obtain a blue card.
Another free learning opportunity
This category is a win, win for everyone in the community! Once a week we’ll post a question as a poll. The subject will always be compliance but will cover the whole range of skill levels and many disciplines of PFP such as firestopping, fire dampers, structural steel coatings, fire doors and so on, there’ll even be some fire science and focused H&S too, giving everyone a free opportunity to prove or/and improve their knowledge and competency within the group as a whole. It’s also our opportunity to give examples of what you could learn or prove through our verified CPD Courses. Available on the classroom tag our custom curated passive fire focused courses contain everything you need in terms of working knowledge to prove that you’re keeping up with changes in regs and installation procedures and compliance and come with an electronically searchable certificate as evidence of that learning. Depending on the depth and level of our courses you will be able to show between 1 and 5 verifiable CPD points as evidence on completion of the course. So without further ado, your first question will be appear in this tab on Friday and then every Friday there’ll be a new question.
3 likes • Feb 19
Great initiative. Regular compliance-focused questions help close the gap between theory and what actually happens on site. In Passive Fire Protection, competence isn’t just about holding a certificate. It’s about understanding systems, limitations, tested details and how they interact with other trades. Opportunities like this help raise the standard across the industry. Looking forward to the first question.👍 🤝
1-6 of 6
Mincho Todorov
2
4points to level up
@mincho-todorov-6782
Construction and Passive Fire Protection specialist

Active 9h ago
Joined Feb 14, 2026
Exeter