Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

The Iron Forge Brotherhood

13.5k members • Free

JP
JTFIT Performance Lab

49 members • $7/month

Mobility & Injury Prevention

172.6k members • Free

3 contributions to JTFIT Performance Lab
Today's news
Federal Judge Dismisses Big Pharma Lawsuit Targeting Compounding Pharmacies A recent federal court decision has drawn major attention in the peptide and GLP-1 space. A lawsuit filed by Eli Lilly against a compounding pharmacy/telehealth provider was dismissed with prejudice, meaning the same legal claim cannot be refiled. This ruling is being discussed widely because of what it does — and does not — mean for compounded GLP-1 medications and related services. What Was the Lawsuit About? Eli Lilly filed suit under the Lanham Act, alleging: False or misleading advertising Unfair competition related to compounded GLP-1 products The goal was to restrict how compounding pharmacies and telehealth companies advertise and compete alongside branded pharmaceutical products. Why Did the Judge Dismiss the Case? The judge ruled that: The plaintiff failed to adequately prove competitive harm and damages The claims did not meet the legal threshold required under the Lanham Act Because the dismissal was with prejudice, that specific legal theory is permanently closed in this case. Why This Matters This decision is seen by many as a procedural win for compounding pharmacies and telehealth providers because: It limits one pathway big pharma attempted to use to challenge compounding operations It reinforces that advertising disputes require clear, provable damages — not assumptions However, the video makes it clear this is not a blanket protection for the industry. Important Limitations to Understand This is one district court ruling, not nationwide precedent It does not change FDA authority or federal compounding laws It does not prevent future lawsuits using different legal arguments Regulatory pressure on compounding pharmacies still exists In short: this decision removes one legal weapon, not the entire arsenal. Practical Takeaway This ruling: Is positive but limited Provides temporary breathing room, not immunity Highlights the importance of compliant language, transparent marketing, and proper operations
1 like • 2d
Great news!!
What the people want
This space is built to be practical, educational, and useful. To make sure the content here actually serves you, I want to hear directly from you. Please comment below and tell me: What topics you want covered in more depth Specific peptides or categories you want broken down Whether you want more education, protocols, lifestyle application, or case studies
2 likes • 24d
Appreciate it. Looking forward to this.
1 like • 20d
Best stacks for different results like fat loss, increase muscle mass, mitochondrial, nootropics, hair skin etc….. And maybe what doesn’t work together. Not sure if this makes sense.
Peptide of the Day: VIP (Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide)
What it is VIP is a naturally occurring neuropeptide involved in communication between the nervous system, immune system, and gut. What it’s known for Supports neuro-immune balance Plays a role in gut motility and absorption Influences vasodilation (blood flow signaling) Involved in circadian rhythm and stress signaling Why people talk about it VIP sits at the intersection of brain ↔ gut ↔ immune signaling, which is why it shows up in discussions around bio-optimization and recovery-focused research. Quick notes Short half-life Very signaling-specific Typically discussed in advanced protocols
0 likes • 21d
Oh yeah took a few times to get used to but definitely like it pre workout
1-3 of 3
Mike Marino
1
1point to level up
@mike-marino-6132
Hello all. I’m Mike.

Active 1d ago
Joined Jan 16, 2026
Connecticut