I just posted something I've been working on for a while, a video that explains exactly what AIography is, where it's going, and why I built it. The short version: I've spent 40 years editing at Warner Brothers, Sony, Disney, HBO, and Netflix. I was there when Avid replaced film. I consulted on Final Cut Pro before it had a name. Every time a transformative technology hit, I watched the same thing happen: everyone focused on the shiny new thing and forgot about the craft. It's happening again with AI. And almost nobody is talking about story. That's what this community is about. 🎬 Watch the video below. If what I'm saying resonates, I'm now offering a Founding Member tier for $29/month, or pay annually and get two months free. Locked in for life. Full access to everything I'm building: courses, live workshops, Lumarka early access, and direct access to me. This window won't stay open forever. Head to the Classroom and hit the Founding Member upgrade. Then come back here and introduce yourself. I want to know who's in the room.

Hey everyone, You've probably seen the news: Darren Aronofsky just released "On This Day… 1776," a short-form Revolutionary War series created through his AI studio with Google DeepMind. SAG voice actors, AI visuals. I haven't watched it yet, so I'm not here to tell you it's good or bad. But I AM here to talk about the reaction — because we've seen this exact movie before. And I mean that literally. 1903 — "The Great Train Robbery" comes out. Audiences panic at the image of a gun pointed at the camera. Some people want films banned entirely. Late 1920s — Sound arrives. Silent film purists, including legendary filmmakers, declare it a gimmick that will destroy the art form. Chaplin refuses to make a talkie for years. Then it was color. Television. Home video. CGI. Digital editing. Streaming. The sky has been falling for 120 years. And yet here we are — with more ways to tell stories than at any point in human history. Now it's AI's turn to be the villain. Look, I get it. There are real ethical concerns. We should absolutely have conversations about compensation, attribution, and impact on working artists. Those conversations matter, and I'm not dismissing them. But the instant pile-on? The "AI slop" mockery before most people have even watched it? That's not thoughtful criticism. That's fear wearing the costume of principle. An Academy Award-nominated filmmaker is experimenting publicly. Taking a risk. Whether this project lands or not, he's pushing into territory most of Hollywood is too scared to touch. For those of us in this community — many of you would never have had access to traditional production resources. These tools are giving you a voice. That's not a threat to creativity. That's an expansion of it. So yeah. I'm going to watch Aronofsky's series with an open mind. Maybe it's great. Maybe it's rough around the edges. Either way, I'd rather see someone swinging than an industry paralyzed by the same fears it's had since a train first rolled toward a camera.