@Oscar Flowers this is what i was expecting, gpt 5 has been dissapointing so far, and GPT has always had a bit more issues with hallucination, but i was hoping there was something i wasn't considering lol

I actually have to push back on the Marketers being Vulnerable to AI automation, just for clarity. not that its wrong, just nuanced. Specific roles are, such as media buying and to an extent copywriting, but actual marketing I think is going to be a VERY reliable and non replaceable industry when it comes to the roles of creative direction, actioning on data for individual brands, Content Production etc. The main discussion imo is how we should define 'vulnerable' to be more clear The vulnerability is not AI replacing Marketing roles, the vulnerability is Marketing teams being replaced by other people who are utilizing AI to its fullest potential. Anyone from Manager level up will have a secure Job as long as they are utilizing AI effectively. The lower end roles are definitely at risk but brands can be handling this in a very smart way by having people learn to use AI to make their jobs more efficient and increase output rather than totally replacing with AI I'd rather have two dialed in copywriters learning AI than an expert AI prompter learning copy writing to replace them. Not only from a cost perspective, but for ensuring quality and giving unique brand voice in a sea of "Everything is completely the same now, all the way down to the Em-Dashes

@Oscar Flowers we typically use Claude as well but our data is so extensive that I’ve had issues with Claude misattributing certain metric points where they shouldn’t What model do you typically use with Claude for metric analytics?

@Oscar Flowers Man Opus would be great if it didn't only let me ask for the equivalent of a restaurants breakfast menu's worth of information before hitting the usage limits.