Google just dropped Gemini 3.1 Flash Live, their new speech-to-speech voice model. In this video, I break down what makes it different, try it out for free in Google AI Studio, and then use Claude Code to build two working demos: a voice agent embedded on a website and a personal assistant that connects to my calendar and ClickUp. I also cover pricing, current limitations, and what it takes to actually deploy something like this.

Claude Code just released auto mode, a new permission setting that sits between "ask before every edit" and "dangerously skip permissions." Instead of stopping your workflow every few seconds or giving Claude free rein to do anything, auto mode uses a classifier to check each action for risk before executing it. Safe actions run automatically, risky ones get flagged. In this video I break down how it works, test it with some real examples, and show you how to turn it on.

In this video, I show you how to use Antigravity with Nano Banana 2 to generate insane images with perfect text using JSON prompting. JSON prompting gives us so much more control over the image generation process, and the results are way more consistent than traditional prompting. Because of that, I built a skill around this workflow so that whenever I want to create an image for a video or any other project, Gemini 3.1 Pro in Antigravity automatically uses the skill to craft a perfect JSON prompt, which then generates a perfect image every time. I walk you through exactly how all of this works step by step and show you how to set it up for yourself so you can start getting the same results. GET THE RESOURCES HERE

I've been watching the AI automation space pretty closely over the last year and I've stayed away from it mainly because I feel like I've seen this movie before. After mentoring hundreds of small businesses through SCORE, in my digital marketing agencies and in my corporate digital career, and growing my own audiences and communities, I've started to notice patterns in what makes businesses actually sustainable. Here's the thing about most "AI automation agencies" right now: they're selling boxes connected by arrows. Zapier workflows. n8n nodes. Make scenarios. API wiring. Clients pay because it used to take someone who knew code to do that wiring, and that person was expensive. But here's what's happening. Claude Code and Cursor can now build those exact workflows from a single prompt (I'm actually doing that, not just saying that I'm doing it). Not just the individual nodes. The whole thing. End to end. Error handling. Iterations. The works. So let me ask you something. When the AI can generate the same workflow in minutes that you used to charge a premium for, what exactly are you selling? This is the buzzsaw. The core product of most automation agencies is becoming fast, cheap, and increasingly self-serve. The thin wrapper around the tools is getting thinner every month. Naval Ravikant talks about leverage. Real leverage comes from something that can't be easily replicated. If your only moat is knowing how to connect two tools together, you've got a structural problem. The tools are getting smarter. You're not. If your leverage is the wiring, the tools are just gonna flat out eat your lunch. If your leverage is the model - the way someone thinks, decides, teaches, sells - you can swap tools as they improve and keep your value. The agencies that survive won't be the ones wiring boxes. They'll be the ones teaching clients how to think about their business in a way that the tools can't teach. Everything else is just a commodity waiting to be automated away.

How much revenue / profit are you guys making every month with your ai businesses?