Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
What is this?
Less
More

Owned by John

Occam's Investing

1 member • Free

Occam’s Investing 💰 We follow the CASH 🚀 Real-Time Forensic Alerts: 🔍 The "Sentiment Razor" Feed: 🧟‍♂️ Avoid Zombies 🤝 High-Signal Community:

JG
John's Group

1 member • Free

Memberships

Retirement REPLACED

26 members • Free

Claude Code Kickstart

541 members • Free

Grow With Evelyn

2.6k members • $33/month

AI Automation Society Plus

3.4k members • $99/month

81 contributions to Occam's Investing
Palantir: Perfect Score, 6x Overvalued — The Most Dangerous Stock in AI?
Palantir Technologies (PLTR) has the highest Occam Score we've ever seen. Rule of 40 score: 103.9. ELITE classification. Cash flow is exceptional. Buffett metrics pass. Lynch says Fast Grower. But the DCF says intrinsic value is $23. The stock trades at $148. That's 6x what the math says it's worth. This is the most dangerous type of stock — a genuinely great company at a genuinely terrible price. Everything the business does is right. Everything the valuation says is wrong. Both things are true at the same time. In this video: - Why a perfect Occam Score doesn't mean buy - The difference between business quality and investment quality - DCF walkthrough: $23 intrinsic vs $148 market price - Buffett metrics: what passed and what the one miss tells you - Lynch Fast Grower classification — and the kill signal that comes with it - AI narrative: why the forensic jury says STRONG_SELL with HIGH confidence - The lesson every growth investor needs to hear Previously: EPD (Pipeline model), CrowdStrike (Standard DCF), AMD (Standard DCF) Try a free valuation: https://insightfulagents.ai/free-valuation.html Join the community: https://www.skool.com/occamsaiinvesting/about Subscribe for weekly stock deep dives. #Palantir #PLTR #StockAnalysis #AI #AIStocks #Valuation #DCF #Overvalued #OccamsInvesting #GrowthStocks #PeterLynch #WarrenBuffett
0
0
EPD: Dividend King at 5.5% Yield — Buy, Hold, or Trap?
Enterprise Products Partners (EPD) has paid increasing distributions for 25+ consecutive years. The yield is 5.5%. The coverage ratio is 1.79x. It looks bulletproof on paper. I have owned them for over 10 years and the income stream is very reliable.
0
0
Crowdstrike is it Worth it?
Is CrowdStrike overvalued at $392? We run CRWD through Occam's Investing — a forensic valuation platform that uses three AI models to cross-check every analysis. CrowdStrike earns a perfect Occam Score of 100 with a Rule of 40 score above 55. It passes 6 of 7 Buffett metrics. Revenue growth is 21.7%. Free cash flow is $1.3 billion. The balance sheet has $5.2B cash against only $820M debt. But the DCF says intrinsic value is $119. The market says $392. Great company. But is it a great investment at this price? The forensic jury weighs in.
0
0
AMD great company. Overvalued stock
I did a quick walkthrough last night on how Occam's investing platform and help you sort out the differences between great companies and over priced stocks. I have owned significant positions in AMD over the years. It is a cyclical semiconductor stock. Don't get pulled in by the hype that it is different this time. The difference is that the fall from grace can be even more dramatic.
0
0
Bank stocks finally get the model they deserve
DCF doesn't work for banks. Never has. When you ran JPM through our platform last week, you got "WACC: N/A" and a meaningless intrinsic value. That's because banks don't generate free cash flow the way normal companies do — they generate returns on equity and net interest margins. Today we shipped a dedicated bank valuation model. Run JPM, BAC, WFC, or any bank stock and you'll see: - **P/Tangible Book Value** — the metric that actually matters for bank valuation - **ROE** — are they earning enough on shareholder equity? - **Net Interest Margin** — how much are they making on the spread? - **Efficiency Ratio** — how lean is the operation? - **Dividend Yield** — sustainable income or stretched payout? No more broken DCF cards. No more N/A values. The AI narrative now evaluates banks on the metrics that bank analysts actually use. This joins our REIT model (FFO/AFFO-based) and BDC model (NAV/NII-based) — three sector-specific models that replace the generic DCF when it doesn't apply. Try it: run JPM and let me know what you think.
1
0
1-10 of 81
John Gillespie
3
5points to level up
@john-gillespie-2749
Founder of Occam’s Investing, where I help investors strip away the market "noise" and focus on the fundamental data that actually drives wealth.

Online now
Joined Jan 27, 2026
Palm Coast, Florida
Powered by