Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
What is this?
Less
More

Owned by Jo

French Learner

1 member • $80/month

Join the weekly community sessions to speak with confidence and enjoy the process. Experience French, don't just study it.

Memberships

Skoolers

195.8k members • Free

The Indie Coach

62 members • Free

3 contributions to The Indie Coach
I need your feedback!!
I’m currently building a marketplace for the business side of filmmaking - designed to connect filmmakers with the service providers they need to get projects made. My main question is: which of these three formats do you prefer? 1) Sharetribe: https://filmmakingbiz-vmerk5.mysharetribe-test.com/ 2) Bubble: https://rnewcombva.bubbleapps.io/version-test?debug_mode=true 3) Replit: https://filmbizmarketplace.replit.app/ I’d also welcome any additional thoughts or advice you may have.
1 like • 6d
The second appear like that... Guess its unwanted. So, for me now, its #3. I like the classy black. As i often work on night, i don't like site who is britter than my own reflection...
Who Owns the Copyright of an AI-Generated Poster? (SKOOL-Exclusive)
AI image tools are exploding across filmmaking, publishing, marketing, and indie production. Posters that once took weeks and thousands of dollars can now be generated in minutes. But here’s the real question: Who actually owns the copyright of a poster made with AI? Let’s try to clear this up. BUT before we do and in order to be clear. This topic is changing all of time and there are active law suits that will likely impact this, so this is a snapshot in time and only my understanding. 1️⃣ The Platform Doesn’t Own Your Poster If you generate a poster using ChatGPT or similar AI tools, the output is generally yours to use. That means you can: - Print it - Sell it - Use it in a pitch deck - Put it on IMDb - Run ads with it The platform does not claim ownership of your output. So far, so good. But this is where most people stop thinking. 2️⃣ Ownership vs. Copyright Protection Are Not the Same Thing There’s a difference between: - Having the right to use something - Having enforceable copyright protection Under current U.S. law, copyright protects human-created works. The U.S. Copyright Office has stated that purely AI-generated content without meaningful human authorship may not qualify for copyright protection. That means if you type: “Epic sci-fi movie poster with a space cowboy” …and download the first image, your legal protection may be limited. However, If you: - Develop detailed prompts - Iterate multiple times - Choose composition intentionally - Combine outputs - Add custom typography - Adjust lighting and color - Composite elements in Photoshop - Design original layout Now you’re exercising creative control. That’s human authorship. And that matters. 3️⃣ For Filmmakers and IP Creators: Don’t Be Lazy If you’re serious about your project, whether it’s a feature, vertical series, graphic novel, or game, don’t rely on raw AI output. Use AI as a tool. Then: - Refine the design - Add original type treatment - Build a branded visual identity - Make intentional creative decisions
Who Owns the Copyright of an AI-Generated Poster? (SKOOL-Exclusive)
0 likes • 11d
You said it: copyright protection depends on how much human creativity you contribute means you finally owns it: you made the prompt to create your poster. Isn't that right ?
Seed & Spark pre-launch.
Hi All, I'm embarking on a crowdfund, which entails a pre-seed round to gain the critical 30% buy-in before launch date. Anyone interested in giving me feedback on the pitch, and maybe reserving a perk so I can feel the momentum building? Thanks in advance, Ian preyformason.com
1 like • 21d
So cool !
1-3 of 3
Jo Fischer
1
3points to level up
@jo-fischer-8071
Movie producer with many hats: Teaching French, English & acting to writing, shooting & popcorn. Ready for action?

Active 4d ago
Joined Mar 1, 2026