Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
What is this?
Less
More
13 contributions to FINDOUTOLOGY
A-313796A4 SAR request
So after sending E.on, Bonez’ expertly written letter, yesterday regarding the SAR, just had this Gonna say SUCCESS!!! Hi Jared, Thank you for your message. I have passed your request to our specialist team to look into the issue and arrange for the information you requested to be sent to you directly. They will ensure you receive the disclosure as soon as possible. If you have any further questions or need additional assistance, please don’t hesitate to get in touch. Kind regards, Sheila
0 likes • 7d
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1dmmD_1KWjSwDDLapft1ZaiNvGKPhcAc5
0 likes • 7d
Hopefully this can be accessed
Quality Bailiffs… need a little help with this one
9 September 2026 Your References: 16248 16231 Dear Sir/Madam, We write to inform you that we have submitted formal requests to Peterborough Magistrates’ Court and the Middle Level Commissioners seeking validation and documentary evidence of the liability orders purportedly granted on 4 August 2026. To date, we have not received the requested documentation and therefore have not been provided with any evidence that the liability orders exist or were validly issued. In the absence of such proof, we require that no further enforcement, recovery, or related action is taken until the requested documentation has been produced and the existence and validity of the liability orders have been confirmed. Proceeding with enforcement before this evidence is provided would be premature, unreasonable, and contrary to the principles of fairness and due process. For the avoidance of doubt, we expressly reserve all our rights in this matter. Should any enforcement or recovery action be taken before satisfactory evidence of the liability orders has been provided, such action will be formally challenged, and we reserve the right to pursue all available remedies in relation to any loss, costs, or prejudice arising from such action. We trust that all action will now be suspended pending receipt of the requested documentation and your written confirmation that no further steps will be taken until this matter has been properly verified. We look forward to your prompt response. Yours faithfully, Mr & Mrs J Wild their reply :- Dear Mr & Mrs Wild, Please find the attached Liability Orders issued by Peterborough Magistrates Courts. As you now have the requested documentation and proof of the Liability Orders being issued. Enforcement action will not be held and as you now have sufficient proof of the orders we trust you will be forthcoming with the funds to settle the accounts. Kind Regards, Operations Team [email protected] image001.png
Quality Bailiffs… need a little help with this one
1 like • 17d
@Bonez aka Clare Hya, thanks for this, I darent pay it as that admits we are liable for the drainage rates and the charging orders logged with the Land Registry, which are already in dispute with the substantiation requests to the Court and middle level
1 like • 17d
@Bonez aka Clare 2 is the definite choice and will keep you updated
More shenanigans from the drainage board
Sorry I’ve been quiet, I’ve been working lates, will be on the next zoom! Ok had this from … you have to seriously study page 2 to find @qualitybailiffs, so I guess it’s a company called Quality Bailiffs Now at first glance I see the first line ‘This notice must be given by the enforcement agent’ now this was in a handwritten envelope along with a second one from the same company but in reference to Euximoor Internal Drainage Board (a subsidiary of MLDB) Second thing I notice is that this is for Business rates for drainage. There’s no business here… Then there is the last liability order dated 4th August, then a ‘compliance stage fee’ Apparently we have until one minute to midnight on the 18th of September to respond I have asked Peterborough Magistrates Court for all documentation regarding the liability orders on the 4th of August And am awaiting their response I now need to address Middle Level for the same documentation and clarification that they have sold the alleged debt to Quality Bailiffs Going to need some of your expert guidance again :) Just to be clear, this is a separate issue from the charging order that we are disputing
More shenanigans from the drainage board
2 likes • 26d
This is my breakdown of the claims in the above letter, I know the wording is terrible, but following Amy’s fantastic lesson 1, I think I have most of the claims and asking for the correct evidence to back up their claims? Claim reference(s) 16231 16248 Dear Sir/Madam We have received your ‘Notice of Enforcement’ letter dated 28th August 2026 To be clear and transparent, this letter does not constitute a complaint nor does it warrant a discussion on procedures We are asking for evidential documents that support your claims 1. Money is owed to Middle Level Drainage Board (MLDB) and Euximoor Internal Drainage Board (EIDB) A. How those amounts were calculated B. Costs involved 2. Who signed this over to Quality Bailiffs? 3. On whose authority are you to execute a schedule 12 of the land drainage act 1991? 4. As you have stated, you are exercising a claim for ‘Business Rates for drainage’ could you please establish what business is involved in this claim? 5. Do you possess the original liability order generated on the 4th August 2026? 6. Do you possess the documentation relating to the liability order, the due process and any contemporaneous documents
0 likes • 20d
Just using this letter as an exercise in picking out claims
Amys Manual
This is fantastic observation from nothing to this .. A GREAT ACHIEVEMENT AMY WELL DONE Thank you for this input
2 likes • 27d
Wow! Ok I’m reading this
JED as we discussed in the meeting Monday.
However, YOU MUST COMPREHEND WHAT YOU ARE REQUESTING.... SUBSTANTIATION REQUEST — M38YX139 / J0271328 Re: Civil National Business Centre Claim No.: M38YX139 Charging Order No.: J0271328 Middle Level Commissioners v Deborah Alexandra Wild Title No.: CB279540 – Cherrytree Farm, Euximoor, Christchurch, Wisbech PE14 9LT Dear Sir/Madam, I write concerning the Final Charging Order dated 1 September 2025, following the Interim Charging Order dated 24 March 2025. This correspondence is a request for the recorded documents and evidential material underlying the application and orders. It is not a request for legal advice, opinion or explanation created for the purposes of responding. The Final Charging Order states, amongst other matters, that the sum of £4,017.69 was owing under Liability Orders dated 23 January 2024 and 5 June 2024, described in the order as having been made in the Petty Sessional Division of Peterborough Magistrates’ Court “in respect of Council Tax”, together with further interest and £284.00 application costs. Please therefore provide copies of the following recorded material: 1. The complete application for the Interim Charging Order, together with every document, statement, certificate, schedule and exhibit filed in support of it. 2. Certified or otherwise complete copies of the two Liability Orders identified in the Final Charging Order as dated: - 23 January 2024; and - 5 June 2024. - The applications, complaints, summonses, statements, schedules or other originating documents upon which each of those Liability Orders was made. - The court record identifying: - the court which made each Liability Order; - the case/reference number; - the claimant/applicant; - the defendant/respondent; - the statutory liability relied upon; - the sum adjudged; - costs awarded; and - the date upon which each order was made. - Documentary clarification of the statement in paragraph 2 of the Final Charging Order that the Liability Orders were made “in respect of Council Tax”, given that the claimant named in the Charging Order proceedings is Middle Level Commissioners.
JED as we discussed in the meeting Monday.
1 like • Aug 20
Hi Bonez, read and digested the letter, it all makes sense to me, I know and understand everything I’m asking for and I know and understand that they will redact as much as possible Which has to lead to ‘beyond reasonable doubt’ and ergo the Land Registry upholds my objection. My only question is, should I send the exact same letter to Middle Level, in the hopes of getting the points answered? Please get back to me
1-10 of 13
Jed Wild
3
37 points to level up
@jed-wild-7580
Jed,

Active 3d ago
Joined Jun 17, 2026