Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

Solar Operations Excellence

175 members • Free

3 contributions to Solar Operations Excellence
Role of Insurance companies....
It happened to me several times. Talking to a project owner. Some lousy products are on the BOM. I advise the owner to re-consider replacing some of the components. Reaction? Nah, I don´t want to add more money into the project. If something goes wrong, I am covered with insurance. My question is obvious: Are the insurance companies aware of the risk which are they taking? And what they do to minimize it? Does anyone here have any practical experience with insurance companies? And how do the insurance companies react for the exponentially growing risk?
3 likes • 3d
I agree with @Călin Sas that the first risk filter is the lender’s Technical Advisor – but that only exists if the project is project-financed. A lot of projects are done balance-sheet or with light due diligence, where nobody is really challenging the BoM below a certain granularity. On the insurance side, some underwriters DO read the TA report and ask smart questions about technology and suppliers. Others are still pricing mainly on MW size, location, and loss history, with limited time to dive into which specific combiner boxes, trackers, or DC cables are being used. That’s where the “exponentially growing risk” you mention can quietly accumulate.
ABB rack with transformer wanted!
Hi, our cooperation partner Hilker Solar from Germany is looking for a new or used ABB rack with transformer. For example, an ABB PVI-55, PVI-110, PVI-165, or PVI-220... the device can also be damaged (except for the transformer, which is needed). Plug-in units are not needed. Does anyone have any ideas or a device?
2 likes • 28d
@Călin Sas Sorry, I don't. I can ask around, but can't promise anything
Before buying more “AI”, what’s the one bottleneck you’d fix first?
Hello everyone, I'm digging into the friction of signal to action and learning how to turn alerts into real fixes on time for the solar energy operations. If you could fix one thing that would boost throughput for most operators, what would it be? Pick one (or add your own): A. Interoperability: alerts flow into work orders fast and clean. - Alert → Work Order sync ≤ 5 min - Device → asset mapping ≥ 98% - Fields don’t get lost (≤ 1% loss) - Status sync both ways Note: For mixed-vendor fleets, mapping is often <98% and alert→WO >15 min, which makes tickets explode from noise. What cutoffs do you use instead? B. Automate low-level office work - Auto-triage - Work orders pre-filled with context - Status + reports auto-updated - Admin time ≤ 12 min/WO C. Parts & first-time fix - Right parts picked ≥ 85% - First-time-fix ≥ 75% - Better routing + diagnostics D. Closeout & reporting - Proof on tickets ≥ 95% (photo/measure) - Report time: ops ≤ 24h, client ≤ 72h - Views matched to audience E. Something else: name it + one example I'll compile your feedback into a 1-page Readiness Checklist (with pass/fail cutoffs + “no-go” rules) and share it here. Many thanks in advance!
1 like • Nov 1
Thanks for the question @Prihandono Aditama I believe that B is key. And I would pick "status sync both ways".
1-3 of 3
Giorgio Bonamini
2
14points to level up
@giorgio-bonamini-8738
Here to improve and uplift this sector.

Active 3d ago
Joined Nov 1, 2025
Zaragoza
Powered by