I agree. It's a state that we, as humans, can't invent. The state though is recognizable by us, but since our mind is under algorithmic social representations (a google in the mind), what we recognize is what google-love-mind puts forward in our mind and it is false. Love, as pointed by Dr Dave Hawkins is a very precise state: its experimented as a force in us, the force of non-separation, making "one", which is a recognizable sienting, with a "letting go" sentience, which is also precise, and a goodness state with the certainty that we are connected to the best of what we are. That state is very high in the hierarchie of feelings and emotions; that's why not very many experience it. But relationships are something that we all experience and because it triggers the love state in us (that is not created by the other but is created out of one's existence), then we mistakenly identify love the relationship with the one who triggered it. Love is not a relationship, it is a state in us, a very high force and because it is so high it takes a lot of virtue and discipline to experience it and keep touch with it.

The mind is included in love, it cannot grasp it

We are brought up to translate our experience into knowing. But knowing with the mind and knowing from consciousness are not the same. The first one leads to self talk and suffering, the second is like space as it permits everything to exist as is, not judging this or that.