When an assignee purchases 100% of the heirs' beneficial interests before a probate is opened, there is significant risk because the estate's net value is often unknown and could ultimately be zero after debts, unknown liens, taxes, and administration expenses. 1)If the estate later turns out to have substantial equity, how does a California probate judge evaluate the fairness of the assignment? 2)Specifically, does the court focus primarily on the price paid at the time of the assignment in light of the known risks and uncertainties, or does it also consider the assignee's eventual profit after the estate is administered? 3)Is it then only wise to purchase beneficial interest when probate has been opened and credit claims are in?