@Mourad Maamar a 200x market cap 🧢 will normally allow for large sums allocated to such an area. Time has, and will continue, to prove A0 is the top platform for serious engineers. The market cap for A0 to allocate funding to these areas will come eventually - for now, the focus is maintained on sustenance, efficiency, quality, safety, and product improvement.

@Mourad Maamar 💎💎💎

@Scott Graham exactly.

🥇

@Scott Graham have you tried reporting the video for sharing unlawful content? These types of videos are dangerous. It takes my session ~2 minutes to scrape 20 videos of this type and instantly integrate the teachings into a workflow that is ready to use on command. I think the truth here is that humanity is simply going to have to learn how to defend themselves and protect themselves from wrongdoer’s. Equivalent in learning how to effectively wield a sword and shield during the dawn of medieval times, etc. 🏰⚔️🛡️We need to start teaching this as mandatory classes in school, starting at grades as young as 6th grade. This should have been a mandatory requirement for education systems, yesterday. If at least 4 of 10 people are highly proficient in Cybersecurity (specifically AI tech) and 3 of 10 have the general understanding/exposure, that increases not only our ability to stay secure but also promotes increased cyber defence innovation, with 7/10 people educated in the minimum level of academia. I also believe that this should be one of any government’s top priorities, dedicating funding to this education campaign. Personally, I would not hire anyone that isn’t already, or wouldn’t be willing to become educated and proficient in AI Cybersecurity. The risks involved and the exposure of naivety is not merely a chance at this point in time, but a guarantee. The almost laughable fact about all of this is that in ~20, maybe 30 years MAX, quantum compute + AI systems will make any innovation or technology obsolete, and that goes both ways. It will be asymmetric to yin and yang ☯️ at a cosmic level, two opposite forces continuously pushing into the other, likely locked at a stand still with minor moves in either direction. It’s impossible to know for sure, but that’s what I feel will be most likely. Simply by following the Law of Correspondence, we can nod to this as being a reasonable assumption.

Similar name (agent0 vs Agent Zero) and not much information on the system itself (is it a platform or is it a training/learning methodology). The concept of Agent 0 is not novel, nor was it invented by Agent Zero AI, however the concept was capitalized on and implemented via the Agent Zero software & platform. So, while I’m sure there are many different “versions” or “types” of workflows and/or systems that also use the agent 0 concept, the Agent Zero AI platform is still unique as a program. I hope this clears things up! If even just a little bit. P.S. I don’t think anyone would be surprised to see copycats pop up, but you know what they say to that regard; it means we are doing something right.