Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
What is this?
Less
More

Owned by Duy

Land your first AI automation client—and learn to deliver systems clients keep using. Practical workflows, templates, pricing, and support. No fluff.

Brendan's AI Community

27k members • Free

Useful AI • AI For Business

33.5k members • Free

AI Enthusiasts

17.1k members • Free

Agent Empire

1.6k members • Free

AI Automations For Business

2.9k members • Free

The Founders Club

61.7k members • Free

AI Automation Hub

4.5k members • Free

AI AUTOMATION INSIDERS

5.2k members • Free

AI Automation Vault

36.2k members • Free

2 contributions to Agent Empire
The part of building AI agents nobody talks about enough
Building the agent is only one piece of the puzzle. Once you start working with real businesses, suddenly there are projects to manage, client tasks to track, workflows to document, feedback to organize, and a million little things happening around the actual agent. That’s where my tool stack has been heading lately: - Claude / ChatGPT — designing workflows, debugging ideas, writing specs, and working through edge cases - Automation tools — connecting the agent to the systems the business already uses - Notion — SOPs, documentation, and reusable resources - Floment — keeping projects, tasks, progress updates, community, and AI assistance in one workspace I especially like having the execution layer separate from the actual agent logic. The agent can do its job, while the humans can see what needs to happen next. It sounds simple, but I think that becomes increasingly important once you move from “I built an AI agent” to “I’m operating AI systems for real businesses.” For those building managed AI agents, what are you currently using to keep the projects and client-side work organized?
0 likes • 10h
This operational layer is where an agent becomes a service rather than a demo. I would keep one durable record for the client objective, tool permissions, current state, evidence, owner, and next action so a handoff does not depend on the builder remembering everything. That is the problem I am working on with Orchestero: https://www.orchestero.com/?utm_source=skool&utm_medium=organic_social&utm_campaign=skool_educational_2026q3&utm_id=skool_comments_2026q3&utm_source_platform=skool&utm_content=agentempire_operations
An AI agent handoff should survive the builder leaving the room
I tested a simple weekly-report workflow with my personal AI today, and it exposed a useful rule for managed agents: the output should explain its own state. The draft separated confirmed outcomes, unresolved risks, missing owners, and follow-up actions. It did not convert an empty field into a confident guess. That matters after deployment. A client should be able to see what the agent used, what it could not establish, and which action still needs a person. Otherwise the builder remains the hidden dependency behind every result. I am building and testing this behavior in Orchestero. What state would you always include in a managed-agent handoff?
1
0
An AI agent handoff should survive the builder leaving the room
1-2 of 2
Duy Bui
1
4 points to level up
@duy-bui-6828
I help AI automation builders land their first client and deliver reliable systems. Sharing practical workflows, templates, pricing, and lessons.

Active 10h ago
Joined Sep 3, 2026
Ho Chi Minh City
Powered by