AI is everywhere right now — but when it comes to actually using it for content, the results can be hit or miss. I’m curious to hear from you: 👉 What AI tools have you personally used to help with your social media content? 👉 Out of everything you’ve tried, which one do you think is the best so far? Could be for brainstorming posts, editing, thumbnails, captions — whatever’s been most useful. Let’s share what’s actually working instead of just hype. Your answer might give someone else here their next big shortcut.

One of the smartest ways to scale is turning one video into many pieces of content. 👉 What’s your stack for repurposing across platforms — and which step saves you the most time?

Do you A/B test thumbnails and titles in a structured way, or just trust your gut and move on? 👉 I’m curious if systems-driven testing actually wins out over instinct long-term.

One of the hardest parts of using AI for YouTube is making sure the script still sounds like you. Most people just ask ChatGPT to “write me a YouTube script about X” — but that’s why it ends up feeling generic. The trick? Ask specific command questions that guide ChatGPT to mirror your voice, pacing, and personality. For example: - Instead of: “Write me a script on credit cards.”Try: “Write a YouTube script in a casual, funny, but authoritative tone. Keep sentences short, add rhetorical questions, and end each section with a call-to-action.” - Instead of: “Make it engaging.”Try: “Start with a hook in the first 3 seconds, break down the main problem in under 1 minute, then use a storytelling example before explaining the solution.” 💡 Pro tip: You can actually teach ChatGPT your style by making a short questionnaire for yourself (“What phrases do I say a lot? How do I explain things? Do I use humor or analogies?”) or by uploading a CSV of your answers. That way, your prompts always have a reference point to pull your voice from. 👉 My question to the group: What are the specific prompts or command styles you’ve used that make your AI-written scripts feel like they’re actually YOU speaking?

I’ve been reflecting on how Skoolers itself works for us. It’s not just a forum. It’s a support system — a place where community builders share challenges, wins, and ideas, and that collective energy keeps everyone moving forward. Now imagine if more professionals ran their own niche communities this way. Take a therapist, trainer, or consultant for example. Most of them charge around $100–$200 an hour for 1:1 sessions. Sounds good, but in reality: - They can only serve a handful of people each day - They hit an income ceiling quickly - And clients often drop off because there’s no ongoing support once the session ends But what if instead of stretching more 1:1 hours, they built a Magnetic Support System for their niche? A space where dozens or even hundreds of clients could stay connected, get guidance, and keep progressing — while the professional spends just an hour a day leading the group. Here’s where it gets interesting. If even 100 members joined at a modest subscription, that could match what many earn through daily 1:1 sessions. At 200 or 500 members, they’d already surpass their usual ceiling. And with 1,000 members, it becomes a career-defining shift — one that’s simply not possible through 1:1 alone. For new people, platforms like YouTube can organically feed members into such communities the same way this Skoolers space attracts and retains us. The thought that excites me: How different would the average professional’s career look if their work was powered by a community engine instead of just a calendar of appointments? Curious to hear: - Do you see this ceiling in your own field? - Have you seen examples of professionals making the shift to a community model? - What do you think holds most people back from creating their own support system?