We always want to quantify success by attaching to whatever metric seems the most correlative to our Ideals. The question, however, is “does this choosing of our metric for success provide insight into our heart or is it simply a crowd sourced trap that we fall into that gradually leads our motivations astray?”; Possibly a bit of both. God has called you to the ministry so our first inclination is to minister but our second inclination is to reproduce or scale this idea to minister to more as my end goal, because surely ministering to more is what God really meant. This is not evil thinking but possibly a bit misguided. Jesus could have taken on multitudes of disciples, but would his ministry have been “more effective” had he chosen to have 24 or 48 or 1024 disciples? I see church attendance to the pastor as a human quantification of a spiritual resource that we need for our own pride to be able to measure something that really isn’t measurable. We find ourselves in the same trap as Anninias and Saphira, God didn’t tell them to give all, just to give but they wanted to quantify their commitment by reaching beyond and making themselves look good. The call of God is equally potent if he has called you to shepherd 12 or 12 million. We simply want to bolster our impact and how else do you measure impact than by numbers? I think we have to shake off the notion of measuring at all, I know this is hard and foreign but true obedience to the call of God is freeing because it puts the impact problem squarely in his hands and rips it from ours. If I do everything God asks, then isn’t he capable of making his ministry exactly what he wants it to be? Why can’t we be content to walk with God in the cool of the day without striving for just a little more?