Well, my biggest takeaway is the important point about developing your unique mechanism, or 'voice', via your production - which threads through future work. If nothing else it's being drawn to the sort of projects you're enthused by. AJ is right when he says, there's only one Tarantino. It's true there's only one Spielberg too! So like Coleman the Butler says to Billy Ray Valentine, "Just be yourself sir, at least they can't take that away from you". My biggest concern however is not paying people. If you want people to work for you for free, then they might not get anything from it at all. At least if they get paid they aren't made to suffer. So I pose the question, why should they be struggling to pay the bills just because they worked on your film? This happens too much in the film business. I actually know someone who worked on the James Cameron film, Titanic who had provided services for one of the departments for the film and she NEVER got paid. She was given excuse after excuse. That movie had a massive budget and was an all-time enormous global box office hit! It's daylight robbery not to pay people for their work. I made a short film for less than $2k shot in just two days and I paid everyone at a price they were happy with, in addition to providing Catering for them, plus fresh Coffee on set if they needed it too. One of them even waived being paid to help me out, but he needn't have! I wouldn't want them to be inconvenienced because of me. Everyone, I'm glad to say, had a positive experience making that film and on wrap everyone was smiling. 😊 I even managed to get a bump up on the budget after production to cover flights to the film festival in Paris. So I don't think it's a great idea to see money as an obstacle. Think positive and if the need is genuine, you'll get the money.