Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

Photovoltaik

299 members • Free

Solar Operations Excellence

176 members • Free

64 contributions to Solar Operations Excellence
Weather modifying expected generation
Is there a simple way to weather adjust data (roughly) to be used for 1,000s of Residential assets clustered in a very small Region? We have monthly performance reviews and the same question comes up? Why was last year batter than this year? Etc… and the answer to all these questions is likely a column with some basic weather adjustment/month. Wanted to get thoughts as this would change my life! Cheers!
3 likes • 2d
It's true and a Big Problem on my Monitor Data Logging Rambos 😎 They assumed the best and when I do upgrade work always look 1 year and 2 year back !!! Than they see ,also after 1 week only ( so they think No major improvement ). So I keep on telling them let's assume March 2025 to look at starting January to May wether it fits in between. No ,always the same response - not better some are "complaining" it's worse than a year before and We did that already Andreas - no improvement that time What they miss out is weather anomalies as You describe +- 2-3 months of . But I say there's every year potatoes and strawberries ..... So look up highest peak! Better Mppt value We are in "transitioning" I had a 180 MW site and I told them to check kWh/kWp. Nope they kept on checking Irradiance or PR value ,which is kind of a Gimmick at the end of the year. I could higher the kWh/kWp at the end of the year. And instead having only 135 MW online ,I pushed the values as high as 175 MW for several hours after fine-tuning !!! So keep on telling them We made BIG progress ,Inverters are All online producing 1-3 hours earlier than before and have the highest Peak Performance going almost 100% output . After 1-2 month it became clear the Plant was outperforming previous years ,starting from March . But the Nonsense from Monitoring Team never stopped ,weather All of a sudden was better , that's only for these 1 or later 2 months than 3 months etc etc. Some guys do the same job for 8-10 years never tried to finetune and are reluctant to learn something new - sadly Of course that's not overall but again 80% of my work are underperforming systems and they are onsite like "headless chicken". I had guys which confirmed over and over not working strings but exactly at 9 am . Those were mounted on east or west facing inclination . In some cases they "outperformed" later the other strings or even inverters. But he was "booking" the numbers since 8 years like clockwork ,never once went to site and gave out the same ticket for years.
3 likes • 1d
Absolutely You can only learn from the Best and Questions they ( still ) have...... I love it .....
Problem with Monopolies
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/agianfran_we-are-facing-a-major-roadblock-with-a-utility-activity-7404287715090919424-wt9l?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_android&rcm=ACoAAAIq-W0B9doX5ZyoUdW0LH1OIL-04-rauPY Utility Grid doesn't allow Solar PV without upgrading Transformer ,which isn't required . That's with most Utilities ( worldwide ) keeping their Monopoly and asking for expensive add ons ......
2 likes • 2d
@Jan Mastny https://www.linkedin.com/posts/sebastian-ewert_energiewende-zaeuhler-activity-7404425959216660481-vbAj?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_android&rcm=ACoAAAIq-W0B9doX5ZyoUdW0LH1OIL-04-rauPY
3 likes • 2d
@Jan Mastny some tried 1,5 years to get a smart meter and gave up . Even Munich City Power has its problem with some providers ..... Thats on purpose ,as they make No Money even pay Money out - who wants that So increasing monthly "metering costs" etc etc
Grid Fluctuations
Hello Guys I’m currently dealing with an issue where one of our solar parks is causing continuous power fluctuations to the grid, which has led the grid operator to shut down the plant when this occurs. The plant has a total installed capacity of 14 MW. At the time of commissioning, the grid infrastructure was not fully ready, so the plant was limited to 50% capacity. This limitation was applied directly at inverter level, where all Sungrow SG250HX inverters were capped at 50% output. In addition, the plant is controlled by a PPC (Power Plant Controller), which performs curtailment based on market signals (e.g., negative pricing). After approximately one year, maintenance was completed on the grid export infrastructure, and the plant was allowed to operate at 100% capacity. Following this change, we started to observe serious instability whenever the plant was actively curtailed by the PPC. We noticed that the inverters were generating large amounts of reactive power, and the cause was initially unclear. This issue persisted for several months. In summary, the inverters receive curtailment and control signals from the PPC, and we strongly suspect that the PPC control parameters (active and reactive power setpoints, control gains, ramps, or droop settings) were tuned when the plant was operating at 50% and were never updated after the plant increased to full capacity. This appears to be causing unstable inverter behavior and oscillations seen by the grid. A key observation is that when we disable the PPC/loggers and turn off both active and reactive power control, the fluctuations stop immediately. This strongly suggests the issue is related to PPC control logic and configuration rather than the inverters or the grid itself. I’d appreciate your thoughts on this.
3 likes • 2d
Yeah, I had this issues in several Plants ,Spain ,Rumania , Ireland ..... It is either the Protocoll or PPC Controller which is asking reactive power and curtailement at the same time. Inverters sometimes wrong Grid Codes ,wrong software ,different software packs between dataloggers and inverters "creating" a YoYo Effect. By that the inverters getting "package" thinking they are alone , so when some invertets go down - others go up which makes AC unbearable. Some fix it with a -10% curtailement in advance to cope with changes other use fixed values for different Transformers so All of them go down to fixed value and than slowly increase . Its the Controller is to slow with All inputs , it creates 30% for one while others are still at 90% output - till they get the Signal Your thought is correct when You stop Controller .....its an ongoing problem ,especially for inverters who can malfunction
3 likes • 2d
The problem differs ,it's about fine-tuning your inverters to "surroundings" - it doesn't help to have the best components and the Utility Grid "is a Beast ". Also if You feedin LV side of a factory ,You need to help out the factory with harmonics,pf ,cost , reactive power . If You won't stabilize the Grid no one will help You out. As You correctly stated ,it was working fine ,but those setpoints must be revaluated - in my sites I do it every 6 months ,could be taps settings of Transformer or setpoints Mppt ,local ,global, sun ,cloudy ..... Keep it simple , but stay "afloat". Don't react when it's to late .
Tier1
Don´t you have the impression that we are overwhelmed with Tier1 products all over?! Despite of existing Bloomberg definition of Tier1, I have the impression that many of the market players have self-declared their Tier1 status. Somehow similar to star-rating in the hotel industry. On the other hand, it can be that some of the "ordinary" module makers might be even better quality than many Tier1. So the question is: Does "Tier1" have any specific meaning for you? Is that the decision-driver?
3 likes • 2d
No its not your right. Most Investors or EPCs try to get overboard and use same products ,same inverters and sadly make same mistakes ....... Some are banklisted as Tier 1 and it definetly still makes sense what badge You receive. Still not All are of same quality ,similar but some are from old lines vs newer lines or even different Cities. Good example Hotels or Flights although 5* rated are not of same quality ..... On another note the BOM list has nothing to say about Transport ,Installation or Output of the System built. With always quicker ,quicker and deadlines which cannot be fulfilled without Tricks and some Transportation issues of Transformers or BESS Project is dead on arrival. The more output ,the less quality . In my days in manufacturing many used durable Silicon material with hardened frames at factory vs kind of still curing Silicone during freight . Sometimes modules cured skew ,other times it was fine or ok. Inventory ,Warehousing is an issue - always was . Producing onetime another !!!
What are you seeing with early-stage leads?
Do you think homeowners today prefer to research solar quietly on their own first, or do they still want to speak to someone early in the process? I’m seeing mixed behavior and I’m curious what you’re seeing in the field :)
3 likes • 4d
You get some real "PV freaks" who know everything about everything ,some even design their own system. Naturally they know nothing about PV but All other neighbors installed PV so he also installs it. All comes towards feedin or like Germany already "matured market " in self consumption. In Germany many start with 2-4 modules called balcony solar which is cheap and almost anywhere available. Once they see it working they get bigger systems. Not every house roof is South facing ,but East West works wonders . It All depends on the Country . In South Africa 2003-2009 I sold PV systems only with backup supply / battery . There was No feedin ,but You had your Internet running ,Lights on and dedicated plugs like fridge ,freezer etc etc Money back in 1 day. Via Feedin or saving like 100 years But loosing 8 hours and longer power supply or sending your employees home or cannot phone - the math added up
1-10 of 64
Andreas Iliou
5
314points to level up
@andreas-iliou-1816
40 > years of experience in troubleshooting of electrical PV installation smoke detection systems 3 Phase Balancing Yield Optimisation Harmonizing

Active 1d ago
Joined Oct 23, 2025
Cambodia
Powered by